Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Miyokan

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Miyokan



 * '''Code letter: F

Miyokan is community banned: this is likely a reincarnation. Same articles, same POV, same behaviour, same hostile interaction with Biophys. Miyokan can be tricky to CU so please cross-ref with all available past IPs. AFAICR he's Australia-based? Thanks. Moreschi (talk) 20:52, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Geographic and technical disparity. -- Avi (talk) 21:20, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, I believe that was actually a sock of, please see Requests for checkuser/Case/Vlad fedorov.Biophys (talk) 03:51, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Miyokan



 * '''Code letter: F/G


 * On 6th May I blocked Miyokan for 10 days. On 10th May this account, Berkunt, was created, and began editing on the 15th, displaying exactly the same Russian-nationalist POV as Miyokan . To me, this seems unethical. One should not be allowed to walk away from a previous block-filled history simply by getting a new account and not telling anyone about it. If I'm right, this isn't the first time Miyokan has done this, as he used to be, and then abandoned that account when that block log got too big. Moreschi (talk) (debate) 12:47, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


 * - too fishingy, Moreschi, sorry - A l is o n  ❤ 18:47, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Please reconsider. If I'm right there is both block evasion and evasion of considerable scrutiny. The two diffs, virtually identical, are surely good evidence of a connection. Moreschi (talk) (debate) 20:36, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 * - as they're geographically disparate - A l is o n  ❤ 20:47, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks anyway :) Moreschi (talk) (debate) 22:02, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''