Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Molobo

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Molobo



 * Code letter: E


 * Supporting evidence: The case is at the 3RR board and was referred to this page. Next to what I'd already mentioned, the edit summary ("restore info about Nazi Germany bombing in September 1939, precise") is most similar to Molobo: "restored info about...", "precise". Sciurinæ (talk) 02:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ Thatcher 03:12, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Molobo 3


User Molobo was blocked for a year, he is known for his interest to Russia-related articles where he likes to put word annexed for all the territorial changes. He also is known to his interest to the article Soviet partisans as well as of negative attitude to User:Irpen and User:Ghirlandajo. After blocking of Molobo there appeared IP editors with the interest to similar articles and similar editorial patterns. Inserting annexed:, , Accusations against Irpen: , Ghirlandajo:, , , Against Russian editors in general: are very similar to used by Molobo. Please check abakharev 01:19, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Mackensen (talk) 21:26, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

User:153.19.48.103 and User:Molobo
I've blocked User:153.19.48.103 as a presumed sock of User:Molobo evading his 3RR ban on Września, and extended Molobo's ban because of it. Molobo protests his innocence; evidence on way or another would be useful William M. Connolley 19:31, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I support William here. Molobo was previously blocked for block evasion, specifically when he posted his comments on WP:AN3. The suspected IP and Molobo edit the same pages. Also, Molobo admitted in the past that he logs in and logs out to edit Wikipedia as he finds fit. --Ghirla -трёп- 10:51, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Suspected sock puppet of User:Molobo in the revert war on both Germanisation and Anti-Polonism. Reasons why he is a suspect as well as why they need to be checked can be found there. Hope I'll get an answer at least here. Sciurinæ 10:43, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * CheckUser evidence does not support the allegation, although it doesn't completely rule it out, either. Kelly Martin (talk) 02:38, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''