Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/MoritzB

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

MoritzB





 * Code letter: E and F


 * Version reverted to:
 * 
 * Reversions:
 * MoritzB, 14:34, 24 August 2007
 * Franz V, 15:47,24 August 2007
 * MoritzB, 16:55, 24 August 2007
 * MoritzB, 17:50, 24 August 2007
 * While User:Franz V has only two edits so far, both of them were used to revert to an edit version of User:MoritzB which had been reverted in the meantime. One such edit had no summary, while the other has "MoritzB is right" as sole summary. Thus, it looks like Franz V is a sock of MoritzB used for the sole purpose of circumventing WP:3RR policy.Ramdrake 22:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: It's probable that this is being done in order to evade a block and is also possible that this user is a user that is already indefinitely blocked. This seems connected to User:Runtshit.  I say this because of the fact that 128.241.111.213 has been blocked as a sockpuppet of User:Icepicktrot2  who is, in turn, a sockpuppet of User:Runtshit.  128.241.111.213 made the exact same edits with the exact same edit summaries as 211.72.213.93, see  and . --Strothra 19:56, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * ❌ to each other. that MoritzB is Runtshit. No comment on the IPs. --Deskana (apples) 16:24, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Can you check the MortizB-Runtshit-IP connection because there is a possibility that this is an indefinitely blocked user? --Strothra 22:17, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Runtshit's contribution history was to make 5 edits which said: "Yes, but Roland Rance is an extremely smelly piece of shit." In the light of my contribution history it is obvious that I am not "Runtshit". However, I would be delighted if an admin confirmed this.
 * MoritzB 22:45, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * It's not "obvious" due to the fact that one of the IPs that was directly connected to Runtshit and happened to make the exact same edits you were making and at the same time you were making them.--Strothra 23:32, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Obviously the vandal just liked my edits which added interesting, sourced scholarly material and reverted back to my version. That is certainly not my fault.
 * MoritzB 23:50, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, yes, a permanently banned vandal agreed with you. That makes your position so much stronger. --Strothra 00:45, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * That | association fallacy does not make your position much stronger.
 * MoritzB 00:59, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''