Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mrinal Pandey

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

The Indian Institute of Planning and Management Sockpuppets
Possibly related to
 * Code letter: D, and possibly E as well
 * Code letter: D, and possibly E as well
 * Code letter: D, and possibly E as well

All the accounts I have listed here are involved in this debate who supported a proposal to delete a controversial section, and these accounts have very little edits, and all their userpage sounds like it was written by one person. Deletion of well-cited information is obviously against any sort of consensus in the Wikipedia community and these accounts are obviously created for the sole purpose to skew consensus. I'm also suspecting that User:Carlisle Rodham, and User:Mrinal Pandey, who actively edits the article, may also be involved in this case as well. So far I have blocked all the obvious sockpuppets, which are accounts with few edits, and I just want to make sure that the less obvious sock puppets gets checked before any action are taken. 山本一郎 (会話) 10:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Supporting evidence:
 * Please note that CheckUser has already ran a CheckUser and blocked the majority of the involved accounts. Though, a range block may be in order here.  Tiptoety  talk 20:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The following are ✅ as the same user:

Individual IPs and a /21 range blocked. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 21:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * All accounts indef blocked & tagged;
 * Case renamed to state that is the sockmaster;
 * Tiptoety talk 22:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Another one:
 * (Already blocked) Tiptoety  talk 19:25, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ matches the others. – Luna Santin  (talk) 22:27, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''



ARBCOM Finding of Fact: "Following a review of Jayen466's evidence and a historic CheckUser result, the Committee considers it likely that User:Wifione is a sockpuppet of User:Empengent, formerly Mrinal Pandey. The User:Wifione account was created and operated while was blocked."(official ruling).