Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mujeerkhan

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

mujeerkhan




I think Mujeerkhan,Hassan,iFaqeer,Mysorebhai,Tipu Hero, shezaad786,indiandesi and Naziakhanum are all sock puppets of the same person, which i guess is Mujbeerakhan Vikramji 18:15, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Code letter: D


 * Perhaps I should expand.All of these "users" have been editing the article Tipu Sultan and the talk page of Talk:Tipu Sultan and have been reverting scholarly edits made by other users. A mediation for this article is pending on AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/September 2006/Hkelkar and there is a strong possibility that this user mujeerkhan is using multiple logins to sway the mediator's opinion by presenting a false consensus.Hkelkar 19:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Update: The mediator for the case has expressed his opinion regarding this matter. He also suspects that some sockpuppetry is going on. See his diff in my talk page . I urge expediency regarding this case as it is presently holding off mediation regarding Tipu Sultan. Thanks.Hkelkar 19:36, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Please pick a code and provide the necessary diffs. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 19:46, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Code picked above (my opinion).Diffs should be provided shortly.Hkelkar 20:03, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * A few diffs, which I, as the advocate for the case, have been asked to find:


 * A fairly hostile statement by Mujeerkhan - the sort of thing that could lead to blocking (IMO)
 * "your breed"?? (by indiandesi
 * this, Shezaad786's fifth edit, seems very developed and an experienced edit (despite his/her comments there)
 * the users onvolved seem to have similar editting time periods (early morning UTC)
 * These are all the links I'm prepared to search for now - there are many, many edits on the Talk:Tipu Sultan page which are all in the same vein, and all by the accused, above. As Hkelkar has mentioned above, I feel that there is "something going on".  In fact, this was my gut feeling frm when I first took the case - I'd like to know whether this feeling is correct or not, based on the evidence provided above, and, hopefully, a checkuser.  Thanks  M  a  rtinp23  21:38, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

✅ with regard to:

Also, you may wish to check the edits of and  which appear related.

These users appear ❌:

The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:42, 13 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for that - would you be able to run another on and ?  I agree that their edit patterns seemed dissimilar, and was surprised to find that they weren't listed here.  Is it possible for a checkuser to be run with these two users and one of the confirmed, to find out mif they are socks (basically to make my mediation job simpler - I'd prefer to be able to safely balance the arguements in the light of who is a sock and who isn't, rather than, as at the moment, getting a distorted view of the situation.  Thanks -  M  a  rtinp23  22:59, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Mujeerkhan



 * - Blocked User for posting racist/uncivil material
 * - Throwaway Sock
 * - Blocked User for posting racist/uncivil material
 * - Blocked User for posting racist/uncivil material
 * - Throwaway Sock
 * - Blocked User for posting racist/uncivil material


 * Code letter: -

User:Mujeerkhan is blatantly using various sockpuppets to push POV on Talk:Tipu Sultan page. He is also troubling User:Hkelkar by issuing undue warnings through socks and himself. He is also posting racist messages thorugh sockpuppets like and. Mahesh Makwana 07:19, 9 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Code? Daniel.Bryant 11:35, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

The Uninvited Co., Inc. 23:45, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''