Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mustafa Kemal Atatürk

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (2nd request)



 * C, D, G:


 * Supporting evidence:

By the diffs, was editing from an IP address (162.84.137.109) in the USA. 

On their talk page, they edit while logged out to respond and then log in to correct that oversight, see, here;
 * Caspian blue contrives this as as attack by blocked user, using the accusation - without checkuser reference to snowball against other contributors.
 * All of Documentingabuse edits have been made from IP address from the same ISP in Japan, see above.

Background

has a record for contriving highly complex, false and onerous complaints about other contributors wasting others time and energy, and using these to obstruct and neutralize others.
 * They have previous operated long term sockpuppet accounts ( themselves.
 * Their reputation for edit-warring on Japanese-Korea related topics has been established and illustrated by their block log is here.

Reasoning and Request
 * The skillful abuse of Wikipedian policies and mechanism is wasteful and damaging, moreso where it is being used to serve other interest outside of those set down by the foundation.
 * Where such remedies are required and applied, they should only be done so honestly and accurately.
 * Deliberate and dishonest wildcard and "snowballing" of accusations in order to serve private ends, and the abuse of administrative functions, should be punished.

As part of an ongoing campaign of intimidation and control by Caspian blue on Japanese-Korea topics, not in the greater interests of the Wikipedia, false accusations and admin abuse should be discouraged.


 * Clarification is requested whether there is actually any reasonable grounds to suspect Mustafa Kemal Atatürk is Documentingabuse and, if not, this record and all records removed.


 * Archived, here,.

Thank you. --Show-me-the-evidence (talk) 07:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * NOTE This filer is a sock of persistent harassing vandal, (=User:Documentingabuse and User:Down-on-the-Everette-Plantation). He has not even listen to any advice of admins nor acknowledge himself with WP:CHU (why my changed name be called a long-term "sockpuppet"?), WP:BLOCK and WP:BAN policies. User:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk was blocked by admin, Maxim and there is NO RFCU on the former except this; where did you get an idea that this file is the second? But there is a possibility that the NYC IP would be an open proxy. The newbie whose first main space edits are same old stuffs to the article of Koreans including original research and violated 3RR referred to "gaming the system" and "meatpuppet" and then directly made "ANI report" in order to evade his violations? That is very uncanny. Nevertheless, this long-term harassment campaign should not be tolerated any more. I strongly request checkusers to range-block this dynamic IP and contact managers of Plala ISP, so that further abuses would be prevented by this vandal. Also this would be relevant for this checkuser request. Requests for checkuser/Case/ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ--Caspian blue 19:35, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * adamantly insists that this a banned user and says that the evidence is in the filing. He has asked that this be removed and is posting here because I, as a clerk, declined to remove the filing but instead defer to the checkusers. Diffs from my talk page are here, here, here and here. Please advise if this should be removed. I see nothing in the archives to confirm the link he suggests. JodyBtalk 19:45, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I was in the unfortunate position of having to clean up this sock drawer the other night, and I can say with near certainty that is a sock of . There was a comment on my talk page the other night placed by an IP sock that is similar in tone to the edits to this page by S-m-t-e. Another sock,, posted a similar message on ANI. Notice the similar use of dashes in the usernames and the similar editing pattern - a series of normal edits followed by a diatribe against Caspian blue. Would it be better to add S-m-t-e to the top of this report or just block per WP:DUCK? Ice Cold Beer (talk) 21:34, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ that the following match :
 * The above list overlaps repeatedly with those listed at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/User:Sea888, and should probably be treated as the same group; if somebody feels up to a merge, go for it. shows no direct relation to the others, but is a very  match for several anons which have also been rumbling about Documentingabuse recently. –  Luna Santin  (talk) 23:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above list overlaps repeatedly with those listed at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/User:Sea888, and should probably be treated as the same group; if somebody feels up to a merge, go for it. shows no direct relation to the others, but is a very  match for several anons which have also been rumbling about Documentingabuse recently. –  Luna Santin  (talk) 23:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above list overlaps repeatedly with those listed at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/User:Sea888, and should probably be treated as the same group; if somebody feels up to a merge, go for it. shows no direct relation to the others, but is a very  match for several anons which have also been rumbling about Documentingabuse recently. –  Luna Santin  (talk) 23:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above list overlaps repeatedly with those listed at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/User:Sea888, and should probably be treated as the same group; if somebody feels up to a merge, go for it. shows no direct relation to the others, but is a very  match for several anons which have also been rumbling about Documentingabuse recently. –  Luna Santin  (talk) 23:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above list overlaps repeatedly with those listed at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/User:Sea888, and should probably be treated as the same group; if somebody feels up to a merge, go for it. shows no direct relation to the others, but is a very  match for several anons which have also been rumbling about Documentingabuse recently. –  Luna Santin  (talk) 23:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above list overlaps repeatedly with those listed at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/User:Sea888, and should probably be treated as the same group; if somebody feels up to a merge, go for it. shows no direct relation to the others, but is a very  match for several anons which have also been rumbling about Documentingabuse recently. –  Luna Santin  (talk) 23:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above list overlaps repeatedly with those listed at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/User:Sea888, and should probably be treated as the same group; if somebody feels up to a merge, go for it. shows no direct relation to the others, but is a very  match for several anons which have also been rumbling about Documentingabuse recently. –  Luna Santin  (talk) 23:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above list overlaps repeatedly with those listed at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/User:Sea888, and should probably be treated as the same group; if somebody feels up to a merge, go for it. shows no direct relation to the others, but is a very  match for several anons which have also been rumbling about Documentingabuse recently. –  Luna Santin  (talk) 23:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above list overlaps repeatedly with those listed at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/User:Sea888, and should probably be treated as the same group; if somebody feels up to a merge, go for it. shows no direct relation to the others, but is a very  match for several anons which have also been rumbling about Documentingabuse recently. –  Luna Santin  (talk) 23:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above list overlaps repeatedly with those listed at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/User:Sea888, and should probably be treated as the same group; if somebody feels up to a merge, go for it. shows no direct relation to the others, but is a very  match for several anons which have also been rumbling about Documentingabuse recently. –  Luna Santin  (talk) 23:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - Please see the latest request at Requests for checkuser/Case/Documentingabuse and a table in Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Documentingabuse. is also a sock of Documentingabuse and Lucyintheskywithdada, and I believe the filer is Lucy. By the way, is it possible that Mustafa is a sock of Requests for checkuser/Case/ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ? --Caspian blue 23:31, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Occidentalist is an obvious match at first glance, looking a bit more  when we take anon edits into account, but no direct overlap (make of that what you will). Lucy is . Looking at Requests for checkuser/Case/ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ, older accounts there are also getting stale, but it's a  technical match and looks pretty similar based on behavior. –  Luna Santin  (talk) 23:42, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * All blocked.  MBisanz  talk 02:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''