Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nácek Ignácek

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Nácek Ignácek



 * And many others.
 * And many others.
 * And many others.
 * And many others.
 * And many others.
 * And many others.
 * And many others.
 * And many others.
 * And many others.
 * And many others.
 * And many others.
 * And many others.
 * And many others.
 * And many others.
 * And many others.


 * Code letter: C, A, possibly B.

There is an ongoing pattern of vandalism and attacks by somebody with a grudge against User:-jkb- and User:Cinik (other targetted pages include User:Tlusťa, User:Dezidor, and User:Egg, possible more). The vandalism includes:
 * Adding of pornographic images to their user pages (or to the now protected Template:User cs):
 * Adding claims that -jkb- is a reconcilee, using his real name:
 * Racist vandalism of Portal:African American/Intro and Mumia Abu-Jamal (posible others):
 * Means of identification: Czech-language user name, sometimes vulgar, sometimes impersonating users of Czech Wikipedia.
 * Related off-Wikipedia accounts include commons:User:Juan_de_Vojníkov (uploaded a picture of a penis to commons:Image:-jkb-.jpg, which then User:Juan de Hnojíkov added to Circumcision); also sk:User:Еgg (vandalizing sk:Upravenec), and others. (There is an ongoing request for Checkuser on meta.wikipedia, but no actions seems to have been taken so far; see that page and also User:-jkb-/Vandalism and impostors.)
 * -jkb- suspects that these vandals are related to the Czech Wikipedia user V. Z., banned after arbitration - he keeps attacking users involved in his arbitration case. See also the list of his sockpuppets on Czech Wikipedia - especially cs:User:Ježek, one of his most recent ones - as well as his English (V. Z.) and Slovak (V. Z.) appearance. - Mike Rosoft 08:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * User:Semenáč is also suspicious to me - he has added a barnstar to V. Z. and re-added it when I removed it; he started editing during V. Z.'s arbitration, seems to be in a conflict with the same users and appears to have similar editing habits (could somebody check this for me?). - Mike Rosoft 10:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay, I may have been too suspicious. - Mike Rosoft 18:12, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Also, if it's feasible to do so, please block the underlying IP(s) to stop this sock parade. Scobell302 09:20, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * And make it a cross-wiki check if possible. - Mike Rosoft 09:50, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The suspected main accounts are too old to check against. I found one undetected sock, and I've blocked the underlying IPs for a week, though. Dmcdevit·t 18:45, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

I am strongly against the result everything OK. See here. And sure V. Z.'s edits are older - Mike Rosoft stated this by him own here. But he said also which accounts were checked as V. Z.'s acounts, and they are quite new. And the result here doesn's say anything about the about fifteen other accounts. And, what is the new sock puppet you are writing about. I strongly request another check with more patience, please. -jkb- 17:34, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

The subsequent checkuser request has failed to link V. Z. with any of the vandals. - Mike Rosoft 09:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''