Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Napierk

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Napierk



 * Code letter: G?


 * Supporting evidence: User has admitted to using both accounts User:BasicB and User:Napierk here already. I requested a third opinion on Basic Black after a dispute on our talkpages. The three new accounts where then created within one our, with all of their edits being on Talk:Basic Black and their respective user pages. The comments on Talk:Basic Black all supported User:BasicB's opinion, which he then used as grounds to reinstert his NPOV & COI statement (really just one sentence, so a lot of fuzz about almost nothing).
 * 05:21, July 5, 2008 Tiger65 (Talk | contribs) New user account
 * 06:06, July 5, 2008 Wingman54 (Talk | contribs) New user account
 * 06:26, July 5, 2008 Blake2581 (Talk | contribs) New user account

--Amalthea (talk) 11:40, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Hmm. I'm not sure here was the correct place to post this? I'm going to duplicate it at Suspected sock puppets in a minute - I'm sorry if posting this here was premature, I have trouble finding the right course of action in WP:SOCK. Cheers, Amalthea (talk) 11:56, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't think a CheckUser investigation is necessary here. The SSP case is enough -- and I think the conclusion (obvious sockpuppets/meatpuppets) is obvious.  (Incidentally, your confusion is exactly why WP:SSP2 is being mooted.  Sam Korn (smoddy) 13:27, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok thanks, I was afraid of that. Cheers, Amalthea (talk) 14:26, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''