Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nasz

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Nasz

 * Code letter: F (Community sanction noticeboard)
 * Code letter: F (Community sanction noticeboard)
 * Code letter: F (Community sanction noticeboard)
 * Code letter: F (Community sanction noticeboard)

Nasz was community banned for adding fringe theory pushing original research in incomprehensible English. Szac, who has exactly the same editing pattern as Nasz, was blocked as a sockpuppet of Nasz earlier today. has the same editing pattern on the same subject of articles, in the same incomprehensible English. A ecis Brievenbus 13:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * . --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 15:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Nasz





 * Code letter: E

This user has been disruptive recently, and has been warned about edit warring. He continually blanks his talk page. Recently, he entered into another edit war, jumping in and reverting to a version by an IP address that nobody else agreed with. I am wondering whether the IP address is him, and he has violated 3RR using that IP address, as he realised that his account is being watched. The page in question is Germanic languages, it's easy to see the potential 3RR violation if you check the page history of that page. Thank you. --Deskana (request backup)  12:37, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * If it's easy to see, it should be easy to provide the links to four diffs showing the 3RR violation asked for in the instructions above. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 15:26, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Not to barge in here, but    . Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 19:50, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks! --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 21:16, 31 January 2007 (UTC)


 * ❌. No underlying connections for the IPs. One's a spam-blacklisted but not open-relay-blacklisted IP in Asia; the other's a dynamic DNS on a cable modem network in the North America. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 21:16, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Opposite sides of the world; no way they could be socks, unless they were meatpuppets. Cheers, Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 22:12, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Not arguing regarding this particular case, but geographic distance disproves nothing; I could be running simultaneous editors from my comfy chair here in Las Vegas and anyplace else in the world. Just takes a little more work. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 22:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, interesting point. I am reminded of . Something suspicious is going on here; I will keep an eye on both Nasz's and 203.101.181.184's contributions. Thank you for your time. Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 23:24, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''