Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nikkul

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Nikkul





 * Code letter: G

Nikkul had been blocked for one month after a previous checkuser result proved to be conclusive. Despite being warned not to use sockpuppets then it looks like he has returned with another clone. (As per his talk page) =Nichalp   «Talk»=  07:55, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

❌.  Voice -of- All  15:54, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Nikkul



 * Added by Saravask 02:49, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Added by Saravask 02:49, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Added by Saravask 02:49, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Added by Saravask 02:49, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Added by Saravask 02:49, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Added by Saravask 02:49, 9 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Code letter: D

User:Fowler&fowler has asked me to investigate a case of possible sockpuppeteering at User talk:Aksi great. After initial investigations, I think there is enough evidence to prove sockpuppeteering. These users were involved in vote-stacking at a consensus measuring vote held here. They have similar areas of interest. I filed this request mainly to see if there is any technical evidence to prove that Indianhilbilly is a sockpuppet of Nikkul. Aksi great (talk) 17:30, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Please see this discussion as well. Thanks. Saravask 19:42, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I also have proof from an external site that Indianhilbilly and Nikkul are the same person. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  15:55, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Please check this soon. I've been wondering too, especially about those four users, and I am not even against them in a content dispute. Those four users may be considered meatpuppets in any case. However, I doubt User:Bangalorevenkat is a sockpuppet. Also, User:Coollemonade seems unlikely. Nor User:Khazadum. But we should really find out soon. The Behnam 18:54, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Where are the diffs? The Behnam 00:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It might be noted that the main four users all have an obsession with adding this picture to the article. Kind of fishy.  The Behnam 00:23, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

✅ except with regard to Khazadum. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 03:45, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''