Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nixer

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Nixer




Nixer has a milelong blocklog and is not a user in good standing. Here he is seen changing his signature because he accidently logged on as Nixer instead of Planemo. This was after a series of account changes by him that morning. here CaesarRosso is seen removing my question about this strange change of signature. He has been invited to talk about his proposed reorganization of the article which is currently against concensus and from previous edit warring we know that such edits must be discussed first. Nixer knows all this already though as he has participated in the development of the article during that period. he is using his socks in bad faith. Also note that User:Zoe had previously blocked him for sockpuppetry in December and that the account Planemo has been used on the same articles that triggered that block but this was not discovered at the time so the block was reverted by another admin. Nixers history of abuse is mile long and this needs to end now. No more temporary blocks that he can just evade using sockpuppets. The Planemo account has been used to evade Nixer's previous blocks and it went undiscovered until I caught him in the act when he changed the signature on the talk page. I'll refrain from reverting him until this is settled by the community. MartinDK 08:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

cross-posted from WP:ANI. Planemo and Ghuter are ✅ by, and CaesarRosso is - see. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 10:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Nixer




Last night, I had the dishonor to be part of a content dispute at Pluto that escalated into Nixer filing a 3RR report and a complaint against the closing admin's actions at WP:ANI. During this time period, a WOW sock/impersonator attacked the article, and in the process of doing that, the Verger first reverted back to Nixer's last version and then reverted the page move. Based on the time frame, I am only a little suspicious of the actions of the second user, and I seriously doubt that it was a failed attempt to revert the page move by reverting the edit history. Ryūlóng 18:51, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Also, based on a similar action by Nixer at Mercury (planet) where he reverted to his version prior to the WOW attack which I had originally reverted, I further believe that Verger is in some way related to Nixer. Ryūlóng 18:59, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Verger's few edits also seem to be in the same areas as Nixer. JoshuaZ 19:28, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I do not know why, but I just have a feeling that one of the three attack accounts might be Nixer who was blocked for disruption and 3RR. Ryūlóng 22:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

All except Verger and Nixer blocked indef. The edits do bare resemblance, and could have been used to game 3RR. Note that Nixer has an extensive block history for 3RR. The account creation times are also suspicious. Voice -of- All  01:58, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * As to block history I think you mean Nixer. JoshuaZ 02:12, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

✅ Verger and Nixer are the same user. Mackensen (talk) 13:51, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * No confirmation on the impersonators? I have a feeling that they might be AOL IPs, and that I know who might be behind them. Ryūlóng 22:28, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''