Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nkras

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Nkras



 * Code letter: F
 * Code letter: F

Diff of ban. If this is Nkras, then he is attempting to sway an RFC, which appears problematic. The Stonewall account has made a comment about religious attacks, which was the blip on the radar, similar to something Nkras often said. This is not perfectly obvious, though, it could be someone else, thus the CU request. — coe l acan — 09:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Question for clerk: there are many IPs in Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Nkras which may be useful in identifying Stonewall. Should these IPs be listed, or would that be a waste of time for the person performing the checkuser? It's no problem for me to list, but I don't want to unnecessarily consume someone's time. — coe l acan — 09:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Tricky question. Of the 35 IPs currently in the category, most appear to come from dynamic ranges, and while I can't speak for any logged in edits which may or may not have been made, I count 8 that have any anon edits inside what I understand to be the period CU records may be available -- and all of them are right about on the edge of that period, at that. Listing here in order of having edited, just in case:
 * From there, I guess we can let the CUs decide how much checking can or needs to be done. – Luna Santin  (talk) 02:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Luna. — coe l acan — 04:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * From there, I guess we can let the CUs decide how much checking can or needs to be done. – Luna Santin  (talk) 02:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Luna. — coe l acan — 04:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * From there, I guess we can let the CUs decide how much checking can or needs to be done. – Luna Santin  (talk) 02:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Luna. — coe l acan — 04:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * From there, I guess we can let the CUs decide how much checking can or needs to be done. – Luna Santin  (talk) 02:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Luna. — coe l acan — 04:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * From there, I guess we can let the CUs decide how much checking can or needs to be done. – Luna Santin  (talk) 02:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Luna. — coe l acan — 04:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

The Uninvited Co., Inc. 20:25, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you, UninvitedCompany. Does that mean the timespan was too long to get IP data, or the IPs were in a similar range but not one of those specific IPs, or something else? — coe l acan — 22:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I can't comment in detail. I compared the two users specified in the check and the technical evidence was inconclusive.  The Uninvited Co., Inc. 02:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''