Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/PANONIAN

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

PANONIAN





 * Code letters: A, E

Just see IP's contribs. We have a dispute about this. IP is Serbian, and simply reverting my contribs to PANONIAN's versions, several times this means the 4th revert to that version. Vince hey, yo! :-) 15:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

It is more than obvious, even if the IP's does not match with PANONIAN, that they are sock- or meatpuppets of him, since it (they) simply continued the edit war, what PANONIAN started by reverting. No such "coincidences" happen. And I had some death sentences (15:42 & 15:59) immediately after I asked for this checkuser at 15:23. --Vince hey, yo! :-) 16:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment: As noted, WhiteEagleSerbianPride and the IP's have been announcing "death sentences" against editors. Recommend priority attention. Newyorkbrad 18:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

PANONIAN has apparently left wikipedia. However, as there have been death threats, I think this checkuser should still be done. We need to know who is going around threatening to execute people. --Tango 22:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

, only because we don't have an  template. . If the IPs are going around making death threats, block them until hell freezes over. If users are making death threats, ditto. If blocking the IPs doesn't stop the accounts, then come back here and ask us to block the IPs used by the accounts. Essjay  ( Talk )  00:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


 * First three (PANONIAN + 212.200.175.214 / 212.200.175.59) was edit warring with me, broke the 3RR (here:, , , , , , ), and it is obvious, that they are the same person in reality (for ex: same edit within' 30 min).


 * Plus: 212.200.175.122 is in the same range as the other two IPs, and it had the same edit, as - so I'm pretty sure, that all of these are the same, so this literally means, that PANONIAN was the one, who wrote death threats to me, so by yr logic he should be blocked indef. --Vince hey, yo! :-) 01:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

I see PANONIAN's recent quit only a way (trick?) to avoid blocking. --Vince hey, yo! :-) 01:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Only CheckUser can show whether those IPs were really used by PANONIAN or they simply joined in. The most recent edit war between VinceB and PANONIAN has been here for a while. Without any evidence from CheckUser, it is very rude to say that a user with a record of 27,114 edits since 2004 and six barnstars "wrote death threats" or that he broke 3RR. Tankred 04:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * He broke 3RR once before. And I may suggest you to read some of his first edits, back in 2004. What you listed here are just aggravating circumstances, and makes the question even bigger, that how could this happen. Anyway, I'm not struggling with editcountitis :)--Vince hey, yo! :-) 14:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

A checkuser is necessary to determine who made the death threats. We've blocked the IP addresses and disposable accounts, we still need to block the main account of whoever it was. We can't do that without a checkuser. --Tango 13:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

❌. No evidence of PANONIAN on any of those IPs. Essjay  ( Talk )  11:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC) ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''