Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Palmer-Ridge

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Palmer-Ridge



 * Code letter:F'''
 * Code letter:F'''
 * Code letter:F'''
 * Code letter:F'''
 * Code letter:F'''
 * Code letter:F'''
 * Code letter:F'''
 * Code letter:F'''
 * Code letter:F'''
 * Code letter:F'''
 * Code letter:F'''
 * Code letter:F'''

What we've got here is a failure to communicate, and a strong relationship to a previous sockpuppeteer using large numbers of accounts apparently as a place to create and store bogus articles and keep track of fantasy wrestling results. Much like the situation with Asadaleem12@hotmail.com, this is a crowd that have been creating false wrestling biographies, both on talk pages (a look at the history of User talk:Palmer-Ridge will give an indication of the general MO prior to its blanking and protection, as will most of the other talk pages involved) and in project space as the user's deleted contributions indicate. Palmer-Ridge was blocked for 24 hours for failure to comply with my requests to stop buggering around and edit productively, ignored that, and thus his talk page was protected; I also blanked the nonsense from the others where required. Palmer-Cat has now begun editing again, on his talk page, creating a bogus infobox for a nonexistent wrestling promotion. This is an obvious sock, but I'd like to know how far the sock farm goes so I can deal with it; from prior indications, if this is Asadaleem12@hotmail.com again, it's probably pretty deep. Tony Fox (arf!) 01:32, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note that I've since indef-blocked Palmer-Cat for Not Getting It(tm). Tony Fox (arf!) 20:18, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

-- Thatcher 12:22, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅, also
 * All the above indef blocked (wipes the sweat from his brow) for sockpuppetry / disruptive / non-constructive multiple accounts (ie. Not getting It (TM)). GBT/C 13:03, 12 April 2008 (UTC)


 * o.O Wow. Thanks, guys, much appreciate the hard work on this one. Tony Fox (arf!) 19:17, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''