Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Papa Carlo

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Papa Carlo


18:48, 30 December 2007 21:34, 30 December 2007 03:59, 31 December 2007
 * Code letter: G
 * Supporting evidence: DIFFS:
 * Code letter: G
 * Supporting evidence: DIFFS:

EXPLANATION: Editors in the article 2007 Georgian demonstrations were warned by admin user:Slakr to stop edit warring. user:Papa Carlo came afterwards to revert prior to a agreed upon version. The edit summary of the IP user that I believe to be a sock of user:Papa Carlo has the same writing style of Papa Carlo. Eventhough WP:3RR was not breached, it is necessary to nip this in the bud due to previous edit warring that occurred in this article. Note that an editor was recently blocked in this article for edit warring eventhough he didn't breach 3RR. Also, alternating between an IP sock and the account would make it very likely for the user to try to WP:GAME. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 04:28, 31 December 2007 (UTC) EDIT: I've also added user:Kober as Kober's writing style is also similar to Papa Carlo. Please check the IP against Kober as well. Kober and Papa Carlo are distinct individuals though. Kober is one of the users warned/blocked for edit warring. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 04:38, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * No need to do any checking here. This IP is indeed mine. This is just me forgetting to log in. (BTW, can somebody somehow change this IP to my username instead in the page history?). Also can someone explain me if one even needs to defend himself here and reveal his IP based on this groundless accusation if no real violation was done. In other words, if I did not admit to this being my IP, would an admin have actually checked it and posted an answer here or would he/she have dismissed this request as unsubstantiated?
 * As for other nonsense written by Pocopocopocopoco... Let me point out that he already checked me and user:Kober a month ago and despite the verdict "Unrelated" here he is doing it again. He seems to start doing it every time he runs in opposition. Is that an acceptable practice?
 * Contrary to what he claims, I was never warned about any edit warring in this page and there was no "agreed upon" version that he keeps pushing. A typical edit-warrior that cannot let go. (PaC (talk) 05:51, 31 December 2007 (UTC))


 * True to his tradition, Pocopocopocopoco continues his attempts at ousting the active contributors to the articles related to Georgia. This user has been suspected of sockpuppetry, but the admin declined to check his account. Since then, Pocopocopocopoco has been incessantly adding POV contents to the Georgia-related articles and has been trying to discredit the opponents. He was recently blocked for edit warring on the 2007 Georgian demonstrations page. That the curious name of this account is so similar to that of User:Pocopoco (who's been inactive since Feb. 2006) should also raise some eyebrow, imho.--KoberTalk 06:00, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


 * is ❌. IP address is as stated - A l is o n  ❤ 14:21, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''