Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Peterwill

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Peterwill



 * G:


 * Supporting evidence: Requesting a checkuser, as it is suspected that the user Peterwill is also Codywarren08. I am unable to provide supporting evidence without administrative assistance, as the page concerned has been completely deleted. It may be restored or viewed by admins to confirm this matter. At 18:20 GMT 28th November,Xymmax removed the page We R One following an AfD, which closed as a delete.

Sometime after this, a redlink Username, user Codywarren08 recreated the page (swiftly removed as a G4 CSD violation), and the page was identical in every detail to the page created by Peterwill. No discrepancies. This makes me suspect both are the same user, attempting to evade the result of the AfD.

The only link I can provide is a reference to the AfD debate in itself, which is here, and to the page itself showing you clearly the multiple deletions this article has gone through, here.

I submit this report for confirmation by CU. Thor Malmjursson (talk) 23:51, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

The original creator of the page in question was User:Aira sytre. Numerous ip addresses have also edited the article. JodyBtalk 15:06, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment to the clerk (From the requester) - Could I request please that all the versions of the created page are reviewed, since if those versions match the Peterwill and Codywarren08 versions, this case may extend beyond the 2 parties named for checking and this could be a sockfarm. Thanks Thor Malmjursson (talk) 16:30, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The checkuser has that capability and will review if needed. JodyBtalk 22:46, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Technical evidence indicates that it is unlikely that any sockpuppetry had occurred on the We R One page. -- Avi (talk) 03:10, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''