Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Poyoyloar

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Poyoyloar




SECOND SET:


 * D, E, G:


 * Supporting evidence: Poyoyloar-related:
 * vs.
 * vs.


 * ArchieHall-related:
 * 
 * 
 * 

This is a rather complex case. There are two SSP reports involved here: Suspected sock puppets/Poyoyloar and Suspected sock puppets/ArchieHall. I think there is sock/meating going on in both cases, but it's hard to tell if all six named parties are guilty, but I'm sure a few are. Rather than repeat the massive detail available in the SSPs, please refer to them for more information. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 21:30, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

All four socks blocked indef, masters one week. Tagged all. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 12:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Poyoyloar, Tromatical, Fearedhallmonitor, and also.
 * ✅ MikeWatt and ArchieHall.
 * Dwaltzwriter is ❌. Thatcher 10:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Wait, let me get this right. So this post on my talk page by ArchieHall where he/she complains about Poyoyloar was all just a scam? That's it. That's the second time I've been jerked around by lying socks like this. I quit now. EconomicsGuy (talk) 13:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * ArchieHall and Poyoyloar are two different people, but both are puppeteers. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 13:35, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Rlevse is correct, there are two different groups of sockpuppets that are unrelated to each other. Thatcher 13:55, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''