Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/PsychD11

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

PsychD11



 * Code letter: E


 * Supporting evidence: See Suspected sock puppets/PsychD11 for diffs. Bwrs (talk) 09:46, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Evidence from the SSP case:

User:PsychD11 is a single purpose account whose sole activity has been to repeatedly blank information from California Graduate Institute (CGI) without leaving edit summaries or commenting on the talk page. See for example:. This user seems especially intent on removing information regarding the accreditation status of GCI, without using edit summaries or the talkpage. Yesterday, I reported PsychD for 3RR violation, and he was indef blocked. Today, User:Mrcal12, appears and picks up right where PsychD left off:, blanking material about the accreditation status of CGI. Prior to his block, PsychD was the only user to blank this information from the page, so seems unlikely (to me) that the appearance of Mrcal is a coincidence. As for User:76.174.28.176, 10 minutes after Mrcal made the edits linked above, this IP left this threat on my talkpage. Yilloslime (t) 17:03, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

✅  YellowMonkey  ( bananabucket ) 03:25, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I would like to add because he or she blanked  the page that was the subject of the WP:SSP case. Bwrs (talk) 15:17, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I am unclear as to whether you're saying that all of them are confirmed, or just some. If some, then whoever opened the WP:SSP case might want to know which ones.  (If you can't tell us, that's fine too, but please say so.)  Thank you. Bwrs (talk) 13:59, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Responses are typically more specific, if only some users are being confirmed. – Luna Santin  (talk) 18:37, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Mrcal12 is indefinitely blocked. Blanking has ceased.  —Wknight94 (talk) 19:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''