Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Radioxpert

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Radioxpert





 * Code letter: C.

On 25 April 2006 this page about an Oregon rock station was created; on 27 June the schedule was added including the night DJ. On 16 March 2007 User:Radioxpert removed the overnight DJ without explanation. On 31 May at blog.myspace.com/crystalkash, the DJ posted frustration that she was not listed. That day the information was restored. 76 began a personal crusade to remove the information: 76.105.159.199  (in this case he tries to change the DJ to "PART TIME STAFF" without a citation but soon goes back to total deletion) And then other IP editors show up making identical edits: 38.100.212.23 71.193.182.6 71.50.9.147 206.192.233.172 208.54.15.131 Furthermore, negative and insulting comments have been posted on the talk page about the DJ, raising WP:BLP issues; 76.105.159.199 alleged that she was "officially ... fill-in staff without a set shift" with false assertions about the KUFO website not listing her. This IP user signed as radioxpert. That day 38.100.212.21 claimed to be a KUFO employee and made more negative comments. In addition that day Radioxpert left a comment disparaging the DJ's talent. A user 71.59.179.114 is almost certainly the same person who has responded to the call-to-arms on the DJ's myspace and thus might be considered a "meat puppet" of the DJ, I am unsure of the relevance of the information but include it for completeness. Eleland 17:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * . Using WHOIS on these IPs shows a multitude of different locations, specifically Oregon, Nevada, Illinois and California. It seems unlikely the account is editing from all of them. And checkuser can't tell you if these are meatpuppets, which is what you seem to be suggesting. --Deskana (talky) 16:22, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''