Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Rastishka

Rastishka





 * Code letter: F


 * Supporting evidence:
 * 
 * 

Rastishka was banned for abusing multiple accounts, soapboxing, POV warring, etc. One of his trademarks is going around adding information of dubious background to articles that says "so and so is jewish, this is their real last name, etc." Mandonkey exhibits classic Rastishka behavior, Trident seems to be exhibiting similar behavior here as well. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 23:10, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

As before, Rastishka is too old for comparison. Mandonkey and Trident13 are in the same city but are otherwise unrelated. Thatcher 11:07, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Rastishka



 * Code letter: F
 * Supporting evidence: Original permablock to Rastishka.
 * Supporting evidence: Original permablock to Rastishka.

Both accounts have a history of pointlessly (and tendentiously) adding people's Jewish background to biographical articles when it is irrelevant to the article. For example: Rastishka - , John celona -

They also have a history of falsely accusing others of stalking: Rastishka (see edit summary) - John celona -

And finally, referring to other edits as "Communist propaganda/apologists" Rastishka - John celona -

I'm almost tempted to say WP:DUCK. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 18:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Way too old to check, although if VoiceOfAll saved the old findings then he might be able to help, so VoiceOfAll. Thatcher 02:47, 4 March 2008 (UTC)


 * VoA has said he doesn't have records, so this will have to be closed as . Thatcher 02:41, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Rastishka



 * Code letter: F
 * Supporting evidence:.
 * Supporting evidence:.

This IP edits the same topics in the same way indefblocked user Rastishka did, and even signs the name of one of his banned sock accounts. Fairly certain this is an attempt to circumvent an indef block. See also Requests for checkuser/Case/Saintrotter -- Nobody of Consequence (talk) 20:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * merged Saintrotter's case here. -- lucasbfr  talk 09:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * - IP is still vandalizing and signing edits with the signature of the indefblocked account. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 21:47, 24 February 2008 (UTC)


 * - as all known accounts are, sorry - A l is o n  ❤ 02:30, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

blocked IP one month based on vandalized and using a sock's sig. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 02:32, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Saintrotter





 * Code letter: F

, aka was blocked indefinitely in May for constant POV pushing, trolling, and soapboxing despite repeated warnings. However, this person has also edited under the static IP 82.33.32.160. This month, the indefblocked user began editing under the IP address (with his typical racist invective and nonsense), even adding his old blocked account name to his signature line in one case, , ,. Suggest at least a permanent soft block to the IP. The Parsnip! 17:29, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * This person is still pushing his POV edits with his IP sockpuppet. He continues to readd racist garbage here with bogus edit summaries. The Parsnip! 17:50, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

✅.  Voice -of- All  04:07, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''