Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/RichSatan

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

RichSatan (2nd case)





 * F:
 * Supporting evidence:

As diff shows, self-confessed sockpuppet of banned user. First CU here. Darkson (BOOM! An interception!) 09:45, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * merged with the previous case. -- lucasbfr  talk 12:03, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * It might also be useful to check against: -- Cailil  talk 21:18, 11 April 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ for Whatevereverever, the 91.84.70.216 IP is unrelated. Thatcher 12:36, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

RichSatan


RichSatan has a history of incivility and ad-hominem attacks his last edit was Feb 21st 2008. Byaahahaha, a probable sock-puppet was indef blocked by User:SirFozzie on Feb 21st 2008 for vandalism and talk page blanking. IP 91.84.95.68 made the same claims that RichSatan started making in Nov 2008 today, on March 12th 2008. If these Ips resolve to RichSatan this trolling has been on-going since at least Feb 2007 to the present day. Talk page blanking and removals of references to RichSatan by RichSatan by Byaahahaha Insistence on the inclusion of unsourced criticism at Talk:Games Workshop by RichSatan by 91.84.95.68 by 82.152.179.208 by 82.152.177.104 by 82.153.198.246 by 82.152.178.70 -- Cailil  talk 19:07, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Code letter: F/G
 * Supporting evidence:
 * Code letter: F/G
 * Supporting evidence:
 * Code letter: F/G
 * Supporting evidence:
 * Code letter: F/G
 * Supporting evidence:
 * Connections with Byaahahaha
 * Connections to the IPs


 * ✅ Thatcher 23:39, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I have blocked the master account indefinitely due to the fact that one of the socks has been blocked indefinitely for bad behavior, and there was a past history on the master account of the same sort of problem. Jehochman Talk 14:42, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''