Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Richard Rolles

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Richard Rolles 4



 * Code letter: F


 * Supporting evidence: Edits by new user on same topic towards same POV, removing cites from sentences and jeopardizing quality status on a WP:GA article., , , . previously confirmed as disruptive sockpuppeteer, see other cases, below. Cirt (talk) 20:32, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Working on this, consulting with other CUs. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 19:32, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

❌ The two listed editors are unrelated. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 00:47, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Richard Rolles 3



 * Code letter: F


 * Supporting evidence: Similar username to, also interest in same exact area. Evading a block. Cirt (talk) 16:43, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Exactly the same style including the bolding and the preoccupation with me personally. If CU does not support then I can make the case otherwise. --Justallofthem (talk) 22:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ - very! Last time, I blocked the underlying IP for a while, which held them off a while. This time, I'm extending significantly - A l is o n  ❤ 06:58, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * blocked and tagged. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 16:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Richard Rolles 2



 * Code letter: F


 * Supporting evidence: Displays identical interest in Talk:List of new religious movements, harassing me (here), and has a similar style. There is also very telling off-wiki evidence, please email me if you require details. --Justallofthem (talk) 17:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I fail to see the harassment in that diff--more like a profound lack of clue in the conjecture of collusion between Cirt and Justallofthem. No comment on putative off-wiki evidence.  Durova Charge! 18:20, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh please Durova, I am being accused of being an "OSAbot" - a paid propagandist. I seem to remember you objecting rather strongly when I termed Cirt such. I really wish that you would not let your apparent desire to cover Cirt get the better of you. --Justallofthem (talk) 18:24, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Please note the use of the term "OSAbot" as further evidence of the sock - compare this edit. --Justallofthem (talk) 18:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, I didn't understand what that meant. Yes, that makes sense now.  Looks like the new account has been indeffed anyway over the username issue.  Durova Charge! 18:47, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * No prop. I would still like the checkuser completed as it reflects on the sockmaster account. --Justallofthem (talk) 18:54, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

✅. Sam Korn (smoddy) 23:03, 13 September 2008 (UTC) confirmed. blocked. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 23:13, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Richard Rolles



 * Code letter: F


 * Supporting evidence: Moxon is clearly from enturbulation.org as was indef-blocked Rolles and displays identical interest in Talk:List of new religious movements, harassing me (please see his accusations on the article talk page), and has a similar style. Rolles previously announced his intention to violate his block, please see this. Note also the username is taken from the enturb.org "enemy", Kendrick Moxon. --Justallofthem (talk) 04:04, 29 August 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ - both of them are the same editor, yes. I've also blocked an underlying IP which was used to post comments attacking User:Justallofthem - A l is o n  ❤ 04:57, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. --Justallofthem (talk) 05:04, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''