Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Rose-mary

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Rose-mary



 * Code letter: F

Luxembourgeois anon, editing Phaistos disk and Proto-Ionians, in the interest of Jean Fauconau. These are Rose-mary's native country, articles of interest, and POV. Do I need diffs? These five are the only edits the account has made. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:32, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delist. No evidence of community block/ban provided. --Deskana (apples) 19:27, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * per request.  Mi r a n da   20:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

and
Rose-mary is the user Gator1 blocked indefinitely for threatening to write an editor's real-life employer. She then wrote Gator1's real-life employer, an and caused serious trouble. Even before the block, Rose-mary usually posted anonymously from a 80.90.* dynamic IP, from Luxembourg. This anon is pushing the same PoV from the same range.

Any actual block should probably be undertaken by somebody from the WP:AMDB list, which was created for trolls like this. Septentrionalis 17:14, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

vs.
Please confirm that this anon is the same as, who has a habit of editing Phaistos Disc as an anon on a dynamic Luxembourg IP. She's heading towards a third consecutive 3RR violation, so her identity may make a difference to the block. Septentrionalis 16:31, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

and
Rose-mary uses a dynamic IP, and prefers not to log in, but she always pushes the same PoV on Phaistos Disc. If she violates 3RR again, it would be useful to have it established that this is the same user. Septentrionalis 20:28, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Highly likely. Jayjg (talk) 05:32, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

User:Rose-mary vs. User:80.90.57.154
At, this anon (dynamic IP - changes every day) and Rose-mary have been edit warring to push fringe theories. I'd like to know if this IP is his/hers, because if so, then there's sockpuppet abuse by impersonation of another user to create the illusion of broader support for a position and by 3RR evasion, as the IP claims not to be Rose-mary. --Latinus 20:28, 27 February 2006 (UTC)


 * It seems likely that they are a match. Raul654 20:56, 27 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The accounts involved include, , Nuvola apps important.svg You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on 80.90.38.214. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. :


 * All these accounts exist only to edit this Phaistos Disc.
 * 80.90.38.214 blocked for "gross 3RR violation", this article 22:11, 26 February 2006
 * Rose-mary admits to being 80.90.38.214:
 * 80.90.38.185 admits to being 80.90.38.214:

Could you see whether 80.90.38.185 is also the same IP? Septentrionalis 21:06, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

80.90.38.185 is a definite match to Rosemary. Raul654 21:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

And 80.90.38.214, if still checkable? Septentrionalis 21:42, 27 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Ha, I think it may time for semi-protection. That IP range has been trolling that article for days now. I know that the semi-protection is only to prevent vandalism, but do you think that this is an WP:IAR situation? Dynamic IPs? His IP'll be changing soon, so blocking his current on won't be much help :-( --Latinus 21:20, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Or just block them all for the WP:3RR violation they've pulled off today, while sockpuppets of a blocked user... Septentrionalis 21:40, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''