Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/SanchiTachi

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

SanchiTachi

 * Code letter: F
 * Code letter: F
 * Code letter: F
 * Code letter: F
 * Code letter: F
 * Code letter: F
 * Code letter: F
 * Code letter: F

Confirmed sockpuppets: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/SanchiTachi And where would I look for the Block log? I know there was an AFD (or something) on him. WP:ANI (put I can't find it in the archives). Swatjester might be able to find the block log better, as he was trying to mediate between Sanchitachi and the users that had problems with hm.
 * We need a link to the block log of the original account and some proof of a link between these accounts. --ST47 Talk 19:13, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Block log. Request is reinstated to the main page. --ST47 Talk 22:37, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Additional suspect user, that's carried on an arguement that the IP above started on my talkpage (and not with me): And another that's seemlessly reverted the same edit: |diff where he admits to being blocked user. And another: I've added all suspected IPs together - hope that's ok.Darkson (Yabba Dabba Doo!) 22:46, 14 July 2007 (UTC) Not 100% on the last one - the edit and tone is the same but... Darkson (Yabba Dabba Doo!) 22:57, 14 July 2007 (UTC) Added a new user, that immediately put an AfD on some 40K articles. I cannot be 100% sure, but the editting style (and refusal to see anyone elses points) is very similar to that of User:SanchiTachi. Darkson (Yabba Dabba Doo!) 21:43, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * What nerve does this guy have when he is the one that refuses to see anyone else's point when there was clearly no third party sources, lots of synthesis, lots of in-universe fan fiction, and other equally bad stuff. NobutoraTakeda 15:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * No comment on the IP addresses, but it's that NobutoraTakeda is a reincarnation of SanchiTachi. Mackensen (talk) 01:00, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * What the hell kind of talk is that? Its obvious that the guy is just trying to get retribution because his fan fluff page was part of a series of pages that I nominated for AfD. NobutoraTakeda 15:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

SanchiTachi

 * Code letter: F
 * Code letter: F
 * Code letter: F
 * Code letter: F
 * Code letter: F

Already has 3 confirmed sockpuppets - here

Can someone clean this up?  Voice -of- All  17:11, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Please cite a code letter, and identify why a check is needed.GrooveDog 19:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Hope I'm doing this right. Code letter F - SanchiTachi has been indefinetely banned, and he's using these accounts to get around it to edit articles he disagrees with. Darkson (Yabba Dabba Doo!) 21:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

.  Voice -of- All  22:59, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

I've added another one. If you check the history here the edits from the different IPs carry on from each other. (Emperor 00:55, 18 June 2007 (UTC))

, I guess, since Darkson added another IP.... GrooveDog 01:54, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * No I haven't. Darkson (Yabba Dabba Doo!) 11:27, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * No I did. Sorry if this caused a problem. (Emperor 12:13, 18 June 2007 (UTC))
 * The ISP ranges are quite broad, several B class ranges like that may come up.  Voice -of- All  18:11, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

An email from Sanchi that may have some bearing on this, preproduced in full (to try and head off any claims about bias in a precis or trimmed down version):

You can stop with the whole claim about me and sock puppets. The wiki people know that the IPs that you keep refering to are those of Baltimore City and are rotating IPs. Its also where Games Workshop's US Headquarters is and where I play Warhammer and discuss the Wiki. I didn't make the edits that you claim. All of my edits are at the Lexicanum only and, if you go over there, you can see that I have spent far too much time editing there to even care about this. I only find out things when people link me to them.

And I never would have removed the Lexicanum link.

Make of that what you will but note above and below that the edits from 4.139. continued edits and discussion seamlessly from those Sanchi was involved in using exactly the same kind of confrontational manner. Although he claims no interest in goingson here that email arrived very rapidly after I made the post here, the contents of which are the ones refered to in the email. As with previous claims these seems disingenuous at best but I'll leave it up to the admins to decide exactly how much salt they are taking with that (also note it was sent via the Wikipedia email system - if I block him, I want as little to do with him as possible, will that block other emails sent through the system here?). (Emperor 02:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC))

SanchiTachi





 * Code letter: G

Anonymous editor appeared shortly after User:SanchiTachi was banned, and began editing in the same general topic area. Editor has been edit-warring over bizarre legal issues - which is similar to some of User:SanchiTachi's assertions and has been performing subtle edits very similar to those which User:SanchiTachi edit warred over just prior to his ban.  --Haemo 07:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Added 4.139.51.127, IP made a similar edit to User talk:Fredrick day as 75.104.133.79 and appeared editing similar articles after Sanchi's block.  It should be noted Sanchi is not banned, just indef blocked.--Isotope23 17:51, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Added 4.139.78.169, posted a reply on my talk page to a message I'd left on the talk page of 75.104.133.79. 75.104 and 4.139 are almost seamlessly carrying on from Sanchi and each other on some talk pages with exactly the same attitude (even to the point of nearly sparking an edit war) e.g.: Talk:Tyranid Hive Fleets see edits for details . Also Talk:Black Library gaming (Warhammer 40,000) (Emperor 18:43, 1 June 2007 (UTC))

✅.  Voice -of- All  23:40, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''