Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Sarah777

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Sarah777



 * Code letter: G


 * Supporting evidence: was indef. blocked as a result of mass disruption and incivility, discussed at WP:ANI and WP:ANI. An indef. block was issued at 20:24 on 26 May 2008. At 21:12, this comment from 64.15.158.59, signed as Sarah777, was placed on her talk page. Another comment at 21:33 was issued by 123.242.230.157, obviously Sarah777.  seicer  &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  00:58, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Since the only recent edits from either IP are to Sarah's own talkpage, surely even if they are her nothing's being violated here? —  iride  scent  01:03, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I’m inclined to give her a pass on those edits as she claims that she didn’t know that she could edit her own talkpage while blocked. — Travis talk  01:05, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. This edit suggests that Sarah will be editing more than her talk page in future. This is probably moot until that point though. Kevin (talk) 01:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Addenum: The point is to find additional IP addresses, given the use of a possible TOR. Seeing this... seicer  &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  01:27, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Possible tor? Both addresses show as "not tor" on both the WP tool and two other tools that I have.  Please.  Risker (talk) 01:38, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Good, then consider it closed. The petty escalation here is simply unwarranted. seicer  &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  01:45, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment. What a waste of time. Please just close this, since it merely distracts from the real issue here. Rockpock  e  t  01:24, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I concur; IP has made no attempt to hide their identity and other than posting on the users page, has done nothing. We already know this is Sara777; checkuser would serve no purpose. Half  Shadow  01:37, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment In agreement, Sarah has acknowledged her IPs & explained her reason for using them. She originally thought she was blocked from her User Page. GoodDay (talk) 02:01, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I think it was reasonable for Seicer to post this, given that it is quite commonly done by such users, but as User:Alison has stated on the AN/I page that Sarah was not engaging in anything like mass sockpuppetry, any concerns about it from me are alleviated. I was/am concerned about another account, MilkFloat (who made a few contributions to this drama), but I'm certain it isn't Sarah. Regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk ) 02:16, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * seicer &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  02:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


 * as being unnecessary here, given that Sarah is now already indefblocked and has made a statement about the IPs. And no, MilkFloat is not Sarah777 - A l is o n  ❤ 02:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''
 * 1) REDIRECT