Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Science3456

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Science3456


Could someone hit the underlying IP addresses with a long block? I think the autoblock will expire soon. —Ruud 15:10, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Just block again. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 20:57, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Science3456
The first user closed an afd he had voted on as a no consensus (Articles for deletion/Jonathan Bowers), the next three all have a similar editing pattern as known sockpuppets of User:Science3456 and voted on the afd. The last two only have edits on their userpage and the afd in question. - Bobet 21:50, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

✅ all. I've hit the IP address with a long block for disruption. Mackensen (talk) 20:12, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Science3456


Football closed an MfD that Science3456 has been using many sockpuppets to close improperly. Football has various unrelated edits, but I believe they were only made to make him look more like an established user (and be able to edit a semi-protected page, too).  r speer  / ɹəəds ɹ  02:48, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Declined. Those being checked must have recent contributions. Essjay (  Talk  •  Connect  )  01:53, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Science3456's latest puppets
Okay, didn't know that the recency rule was that restrictive. In that case, I'd like to compare two users that I consider to be recent sockpuppets of Science3456:

Again, they were both involved in improperly closing the same MFD that many Science3456 puppets have been closing or disrupting.  r speer  / ɹəəds ɹ  03:08, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Note: There isn't a recency "rule," it's a technical limitation; IP addresses are only stored for a certain period of time. This is indicated in the instructions to the page, #4: "Data is kept for a limited time so we cannot compare against accounts that have not edited recently." Additionally, please place requests in this section, rather than at the end of the completed queue. Essjay (  Talk  •  Connect  )  03:27, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Inconclusive. If there are other recent sockpuppets, I can check against them. Essjay (  Talk  •  Connect  )  03:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Can I have a list of account that have edited from, , , , , , or  and are not yet listed in Category:Wikipedia:Suspected sockpuppets of Science3456? Cheers, —Ruud 01:23, 4 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Declined. This request does not meet any of the criteria listed in the instructions. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 02:29, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''