Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/SecretChiefs3

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

SecretChiefs3



 * Code letter: G


 * Supporting evidence:

An AFD discussion has produced four five SPAs that have "blossomed" since that discussion started. That article was intially edited by a well-documented sockpuppeteer (User:SecretChiefs3), whose been very active recently creating accounts.

Also, that AFD discussion has been clogged almost beyond recognition with content discussion, and wikilawyering on others' talk pages, while ignoring warnings on their own — something that fits the SecretChiefs3 socks' pattern. MARussellPESE (talk) 21:19, 18 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Oops. Sorry. This should be entitled "RFC/Case/SecretChiefs3". I think that that really is the root account, but I didn't see the instructions until after the page was created. Apologies for any inconvenience. MARussellPESE (talk) 21:25, 18 July 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ - sockies all the way down, as well as usage of TOR. The following are socks of :




 * is actually ❌


 * Please also see Requests for checkuser/Case/Thamarih for further linkages - A l is o n  ❤ 05:47, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged, page also moved to appropriate title. Tiptoety  talk 06:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Just as a quick note, this request is also linked with Requests for checkuser/Case/Thamarih. Although I decided to not block Ahwa after that case, I think the TOR usage means we should go ahead and err on the side of caution.  Sorry for not noting this earlier! -- jonny - m  t  08:54, 19 July 2008 (UTC)


 * There are a couple other possible socks involved, can they please also be checked? Edward321 (talk) 15:04, 19 July 2008 (UTC)




 * ✅ - also -  A l is o n  ❤ 15:53, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Confirmed accounts blocked and tagged. Tiptoety  talk 02:27, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * There's yet another possible sock involved. Could someone please check it as well.  Edward321 (talk) 14:32, 20 July 2008 (UTC)




 * as unnecessary at this point. Block on behaviour - A l is o n  ❤ 16:29, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''