Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/ShabzarBot

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

ShabzarBot





 * Code letter: G

Per Special:Contributions/ShabzarBot, account claims to have been hacked by BuickCenturyDriver. I don't believe this, and I would like to idenify the actual hacker. I have strong doubts that it is BuickCenturyDriver, but I believe a check is warrented, to make sure that the hacker cannot strike again. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 00:27, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I would also like to check if the bot account was ever used by Shabzar, so add to the list. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 00:31, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

added Shabzar to the main list per the above request. Kwsn (Ni!) 01:08, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Who the hell knows, really? It's open proxies galore for the period in question, all of which are now blocked. Mackensen (talk) 01:12, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * No-one at the moment, that's the point of a checkuser. To identify if it was shabzar, if he ever owned the account, if it was buickcenturydriver, or if not, who it actually was. At least itll prove it wasnt one of the two good users. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 01:24, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

We're done here, incidentally. Mackensen (talk) 11:04, 25 July 2007 (UTC)


 * We are? What's the result? Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 01:15, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Stated above. They're all open proxies for the period in question. Therefore, it's quite impossible to state with any certainty who's who. Mackensen (talk) 20:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Ahh, I misunderstood the "Who the hell knows, really?" to be that it hadn't been done. I didn't realise, until checking, that you were a checkuser and the result was that it was impossible to tell. My bad! Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 01:34, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''