Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Shac1

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Shac1



 * Code letter: G.
 * Code letter: G.
 * Code letter: G.
 * Code letter: G.

Shac1 was blocked earlier today for 24 hours for a 3RR violation based on my report. Naturally, he or she was very displeased and discussed my edits, edit history, and my general character on his or her Talk page. Now a brand new editor, arla364, has registered and his or her first two edits are to (a) file a bogus 3RR violation charge against me (I've edited the article twice and only one of those was a reversion) and (b) defend Shac1 and further accuse me of 3RR violations, whitewashing, etc. I further note that the language used by both editors is similar, including their frequent misuse of 2 sets of braces ( and  ) when adding links to Wikipedia discussions. ElKevbo 23:07, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * ShacOne added to this RFCU. The name is obviously similar and the only two edits are to my Talk page and the article for which Shac1 was blocked for violating 3RR.  Natalie Erin, an admin, has already blocked ShacOne as a sockpuppet.  I'm not sure about this as the edits made don't seem to quite fit Shac1's pattern.  But there is obviously some connection and an RFCU might be the only way to figure it out.  --ElKevbo 03:32, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * And Pizzaman0000 also appears to be involved in all of this, too. More info can be found on Natalie's Talk page and Shac1's Talk page.  --ElKevbo 14:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It is now less clear to me whose sockpuppet ShacOne is - either Shac1, Pizzaman0000, or they are all the same person. Shac1 has been unblocked, as his/her original 24 hr block is over and the sockpuppetry is less clear now. Natalie 14:55, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * ✅ that ShacOne and Pizzaman000 are the same. ✅ that Shac1 and arla361 are the same. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 02:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''