Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Shortcut.road

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Shortcut.road





 * Code Letter: E

I'm mediating a case related to the Neil Bush article. You can find the complete record of the ongoing mediation here. Before we get too involved in mediation, i wanted to make sure that no sock puppets are unfarily swinging straw polls or the course of discussion. While doing some research on the users and ips in question, I noticed a couple of possible violations of the 3RR using the accounts. One such example can be seen through these four comparisons:
 * 1. 11-01-06 at 21:01 - Shortcut.road reverts "to sane content".
 * 2. 11-02-06 at 10:20 - BlazingBuggles reverts "to facts".
 * 3. 11-02-06 at 11:42 - BlazingBuggles reverts.
 * 4. 11-02-06 at 12:40 - Schlotzsman reverts.

Please note that this is only one such example where more than 3 reversions occured within 24 hours as a result of some combination of the above accounts. See the page history for other such instances. More evidence supporting sock-puppetry can be found by following the edit histories of each of the above users:
 * Shortcut.road - First post on 10/13. All posts relate to Neil Bush (including some relating to a Bush founded company). (Contribs)
 * BlazinBuggles - First post on 10/19. All subsequent posts related to Neil Bush. (Contribs)
 * Schlotzsman - First post on 10/25. With exception of a couple of minor edits, all posts related to Neil Bush. (Contribs)
 * AuntEthel - First post on 10/30. Majority of edits related to Neil Bush. (Contribs)
 * 67.101.67.107 - Only a handful of posts on this exact ip. (Contribs)
 * 70.113.208.174 - Has about 70 total edits. With the exception of some Halo related articles, all edits relate to Neil Bush. (Contribs)
 * 64.148.31.150 - One of the original participants in the devate. Only 4 edits total, all to Neil Bush related topics.(Contribs)
 * 64.148.31.150 - Late Addition. It was brought to my attention after posting that I neglected to add this ip.  Similar edit history to several other folks listed here. (Contribs)

Let me end this nomination by saying I hope I'm wrong about this. I'd love to know that all the above are seperate individuals with a similar editing style. However, in order to be sure my mediation proceeds smoothly, it's important that all interested parties know for certain. Thanks for the help! →Bobby ← 18:49, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * ✅ all accounts. Dmcdevit·t 03:31, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''