Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/SimpsonsFan08

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

SimpsonsFan08



 * Code letter: F

I endorse this request. As soon as his socks are blocked, he makes new ones. Pls block underlying IPs too. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 01:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Supporting evidence: See One, Two, and Three. I'm submitting this following a discussion with Rlevse about the continuous flow of sockpuppets. I'm requesting that a rangeblock be applied to include the underlying IPs, assuming the collateral damage is minimal. The reason I believe checkuser is justified in this case is because there is no end in sight to the abusive sockpuppeteering. Every time a sockpuppet is outed by User:EJF or myself (and then blocked), another one appears.  Enigma  message 23:19, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ these are the same user. Also .  The range is too big and dynamic to block. Thatcher 03:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * So we're stuck, basically. Unfortunate, because the socks keep flying in.  Enigma  message 04:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I added King Monty IV and Connorjack to the list at the top. Not that it matters much, though. As of now, Grandoldman is the only one of the accounts that's not blocked.  Enigma  message 04:35, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * all accounts blocked and tagged. Tiptoety  talk 16:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''