Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Skull 'n' Femurs

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Skull 'n' Femurs




Gratefull if someone could check this out. The assertion has been made before that Imacomp is one of SnFs stable of socks and when the point was highlighted the other day it wasn't denied, the response was threats and mutual accusations. Imacomp has only shown an interest in edits within a section posted by SnF shortly before his block and is refusing to contenance discussion, just accusing anyone disputing the detail as acting in poor taste (issues are related to the Holocaust). The use of threats as a response to any request for dialogue is also very similar. Many thanks. ALR 15:16, 26 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Also note this diff of Imacomps user page: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Imacomp&oldid=37208018 which highlights a connection.ALR 15:23, 27 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Supplementary to that last:


 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Imacomp&oldid=37208018
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bolton_TI&diff=prev&oldid=37207807
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Hiram_man&diff=prev&oldid=37207876


 * None of which prove anything in their own right, but they do tend to add evidence. ALR 17:22, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

IT WAS denied to ALR, and I asked for a retraction. However he persists. ALR is one of a stable of socks by Anti-Masons (posing as a Mason) only shown a more active interest in edits within a section posted by SnF after his block, and and is refusing to contenance discussion. "Skull 'n' Femurs" did once post an unsolicited comment on my Home page once, and I gave him a Barnstar in his early (better)days. That is the sum total of interactions - and many other editors interacted more. ALR's actions are in poor taste (issues are related to the Holocaust), as are several others. I removed stuff on the subject, and complained on the talk page of Freemasonry. The use of threats as a response to any request is ALRs style. Many thanks. Imacomp 14:05, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

A match between Imacomp and Skull 'n' Femurs appears likely. Per Imacomp's allegation, I ran a sockpuppet check against ALR. ALR shares his IP with a great many other users, which (upon furthrer checking) appears to be a proxy server shared by many thousands of internet users. Raul654 21:48, 27 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I can confirm tht I spent most of today using my employers network to access WP, circa 200,000 users on that gateway. Thanks for the checks anyway.ALR 22:06, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made below, in a new section.

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

and
Can we have a check on and  again please. This was checked at [] but It would be useful to confim the assessment. SnF was recently banned based on a statement of intent to systematically remove well-referenced information from Wikipedia and Imacomps behaviour is tending tow indicate that it's the same person. Most notably is an increasing use of edit summaries to convey personal attacks. If there is a corroboration of the previous check then I'll report over on WP:AN/I for an enforcement of the ban. ThanksALR 15:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * User:ALR that will be user:lightbringer again will it? Imacomp 12:49, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Can I just highlight that this requirement has not gone away, Imacomps conduct on a number of Freemasonry related pages could be construed as being disruptive, there have been a number of complaints of personal attacks and edit summaries are increasingly used as vehicles for those attacks. There appears to be general consensus amongst regular users of these pages that Imacomp is a sock of SnF.ALR 15:27, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Inconclusive. Jayjg (talk) 21:54, 21 March 2006 (UTC)


 * thanks for running the check anyway.ALR 22:00, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''