Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Sobrider

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Sobrider




In the deletion discussion for Game junkie, Sobrider has been the most adamant defender of keeping the article. Recently, the other listed users began voting and commenting in the discussion with a style similar to Sobrider's writing, and whose only contributions have been to either the deletion discussion or the Game junkie article. Requesting a check to see if these accounts are socks or not. NeoChaosX [ talk | contribs ] 07:38, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

This falls under #2 (obvious) and #3 (throwaway) of the policy at the top of the page. The AfD closing admin can rightly discount or ignore the comments of these users without technical proof. Thatcher131 (talk) 12:34, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

unless this spreads elsewhere. Mackensen (talk) 01:29, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''