Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Spartaz

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Spartaz2



 * Code letter: E

Suspected evasion of 3RR in Passport, where his liberal insertions of tags is contested by several users. `'mikka (t) 17:27, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 19:21, 12 October 2006 (spartaz:) his summary: "revert to version with correct tags for unverified images"
 * 07:45, 13 October 2006 70.52.72.33: edit summary "rv"
 * 16:36, 13 October 2006 zpartaz: edit summary: "restore tag"
 * 19:08, 13 October 2006 spartaz: edit summary: "revert to last version with correct tags for unverified images"
 * 20:15, 13 October 2006 spartaz: edit summary: "his is my third revert. user:mikklai is being disruptive and removing tags on disputed images that WP:PUI requires them for disputed images"

I am reproducing this request that wa spreviously rejected as "obvious" because it wasn't me and its hardly surprising that a high traffic board will generate someone to add some tags I missed. I want to clear my name. Please can someone do the check to prove this? Thanks Spartaz 06:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * , that's not what checkuser is for. Dmcdevit·t 16:56, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * How am I supposed to demonstrate that I wasn't sockpuppeting then? Spartaz 17:51, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Spartaz





 * Code letter: E

Suspected evasion of 3RR in Passport, where his liberal insertions of tags is contested by several users. `'mikka (t) 17:27, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 19:21, 12 October 2006 (spartaz:) his summary: "revert to version with correct tags for unverified images"
 * 07:45, 13 October 2006 70.52.72.33: edit summary "rv"
 * 16:36, 13 October 2006 zpartaz: edit summary: "restore tag"
 * 19:08, 13 October 2006 spartaz: edit summary: "revert to last version with correct tags for unverified images"
 * 20:15, 13 October 2006 spartaz: edit summary: "his is my third revert. user:mikklai is being disruptive and removing tags on disputed images that WP:PUI requires them for disputed images"

obvious. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 19:42, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm necroing this declined request because I'm not a sockpuppet and I have been blocked in part because this claim was used to support a 3RR case. I'm guilty of editing the section 4 times in 24 hours but I wasn't reverting the last. Nevermind that, I wish to clear my name and would like to request the above checkuser to be run in an attempt to clear my name. I have a fixed IP and I am editing this logged out to publiclly reveal my IP address. I would be very grateful if a checkuser could confirm that my IP is not the same as that claimed as a sockpuppet. Regards Spartaz 83.94.183.28 15:32, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

I shoulf also add that I travel with my job and have made loads of edits from hotels allround the baltic states and scandinavia but the results should show that for the last few days I have been in Copenhagen and editing from the fixed IP. 83.94.183.28 16:04, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''