Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Srkris

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Srkris





 * BCEF:

User:Srkris, blocked for one week for violations of WP:COPY, WP:SPAM, WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF, etc has returned and has been editing anonymously. Parthi talk/contribs 20:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

This user using these ips has been editing and reverting the same articles User:Srkris used to edit. He is also leaving fake warning messages in other users talk pages:,. This is in clear violation of the one week block handed down for consistent violation of a number of policies. - Parthi talk/contribs 22:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment I endorse this request as the admin who performed the user block. Durova Charg e!  02:46, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

. Mackensen (talk) 14:22, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: It is not clear why this request was declined. If it is due to lack of diffs, here are some which clearly shows that this user identifies with the blocked editor:
 * - acceptance that he is User:Srkris and is breaking the block
 * 59.92.83.63 - incivility
 * 59.92.83.63 - reverting copyvio notices and questioning the validity of WP guidelines. WP:COI
 * - incivlity
 * 59.92.87.43 - incivility and acceptance that he is user:Srkris
 * 59.92.87.43 - acceptance that he is user:Srkris
 * - Personal attacks
 * 59.92.46.252 - disputing blatent copyvio and questioning the validity of WP guidelines.
 * 59.92.46.252 - reverting copyvio notices
 * 59.92.46.252 - Incivility
 * 59.92.46.252 - reverting blatent copyvio notice
 * 59.92.46.252 - WP:COI violations and the acceptance that he is User:Srkris
 * 59.92.46.252 - reverting copyvio notice
 * - Personal attacks and vandalising my User page
 * 59.92.63.37 - Fake warnings in my talk page
 * 59.92.63.37 - acceptance that he is User:Srkris
 * - Incivility and acceptance that he is User:Srkris
 * ,, , - 3RR violations using anon edits
 * Thanks Parthi talk/contribs 22:16, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

. Absent a serious policy violation we cannot "out" IP addresses. Mackensen (talk) 01:44, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * WP:NPA, WP:AGF, WP:COPY, WP:COI, WP:3RR, WP:Vandal, etc cited above are not policy violations? Parthi talk/contribs 01:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * You've overlooked "serious." Mackensen (talk) 02:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Am I to understand that avoidance of blocks by editing anonymously is not a serious breach of policy? Can you also please direct me to the policy which clearly defines the circumstances for a valid checkuser? thanks Parthi talk/contribs 02:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

This request has been denied, and will be staying that way. Please archive this before it escalates any further. Those interested can find the Board-approved checkuser policy at Checkuser policy. Essjay  ( Talk )  05:24, 11 December 2006 (UTC) ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''