Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Stone put to sky

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Stone put to sky


Stone put to sky as shown previously here has used many sockpuppets. He was blocked on April 15. Appeal denied on April 17. DrGabriela is an account which had made very few edits before this. On April 18 DrGabriela suddenly started making many edits. One interest is related to Philippine left-wing organizations.,Stone put to sky has a similar interest. DrGabriela's and Stone put to sky's major interest is articles about terrorism and in particular Allegations of state terrorism by the United States.Ultramarine (talk) 14:19, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Code letter: F
 * Supporting evidence:
 * Supporting evidence:

Adddition: Also please check HooperBandP which is another account suddenly starting making many edits on April 18 including to the Allegations of state terrorism by the United States article.Ultramarine (talk) 15:55, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Reply:: I, as you can see on my userpage, follow pages that I believe are improperly tagged for relevatism and bad faith reasons. That is what got me on the page.  Just because I do not agree with you does not make me a sock puppit.  I understand your care but this is my only account.  I live in Paducah, KY and you can check my contributions for most of my interest and I am NOT any of these other people. Hooper (talk) 17:40, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


 * ❌. However, DrGabriela is within the same 30 mile radius as,  and , but on a different ISP. Thatcher 16:50, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Stone put to sky


Another crop of abusive socks and IPs has caused State_terrorism_and_the_United_States to be locked. Given that Stone was just found guilty of this below, and recently, and these exhibit the same behavior, I thought it a good idea to ask for another CU. - Merzbow (talk) 07:32, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Code letter: E
 * Supporting evidence:
 * Code letter: E
 * Supporting evidence:
 * Code letter: E
 * Supporting evidence:


 * All ❌ as far as I can tell. Thatcher 11:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Note that Rafaelsfingers has some similarities but is not an exact match to 76.102.72.153, and 64.118.111.137 is a different ISP in the same geographic area.  Stone put to sky and Ghtyhfh are ❌ as far as I can tell. Thatcher 13:20, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Sockmaster:
 * One more time, please!

Suspected sockpuppets:
 * - Likely
 * - blocked previously based on
 * - Likely
 * - Likely - now blocked on behavioral evidence.
 * - Likely - now blocked on behavioral evidence.

See Suspected sock puppets/Rafaelsfingers. Please recheck the accounts above. The behavioral evidence suggests that they are all the same editor. They certainly all are tendentious. Jehochman Talk 02:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Stone and Supergreenred are ❌. The previous conclusions regarding Morriss levy, Thecryptthing, Aho aho and YumpinYimini remain the same. Thatcher 10:59, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I have blocked the likely socks and likely puppetmaster based on these results and the behavioral evidence at Suspected sock puppets/Rafaelsfingers. Jehochman Talk 03:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Stone put to sky


Stone put to sky was recently blocked for 3RR violation and the use sockpuppets. Also for creating attack accounts and personal attacks against me. See previous checkuser at "Attack accounts": N4GMiraflores edits the same articles as Stone put to sky and has followed me around reverting my edits despite only being having few edits in Wikipeda. 118.165.217.88 is similar to the accounts found on the previous checkuser. These two now reverts on the same article Stone put to sky was previously blocked for using sockpuppets on. Finally, User:TenOfSpades was a very strange account trying to frame me for using sockpuppets.Ultramarine (talk) 05:15, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Code letter: E
 * Supporting evidence:
 * Code letter: E
 * Supporting evidence:
 * Code letter: E
 * Supporting evidence:


 * Note that is already indef-blocked. MastCell Talk 19:52, 6 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I have added because of the similarity in usernames to TenOfSpades and the user's only contibution is similar to TenOfSpades' contributions. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 07:01, 7 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The other named accounts are ❌ to Stone put to sky. TenOfSpades and ElevenOfHearts are of course ✅ as the same user; there are some other accounts on a shared IP so I want to ask for a consultation.  N4GMiraflores is in the same city as Ten and Eleven but on a different ISP.

Thatcher 21:11, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * However there are a number of additional accounts that are Stone put to sky:


 * p.s., is the same user as TenOfSpades and ElevenOfHearts. Thatcher 21:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

This is ridiculous. I have no relationship whatsoever to any of these accounts. Moreover, since i am almost always posting from my home there is no possibility that any of these ip addresses match mine. So essentially -- and correct me if i'm wrong, here -- what we have is basic guesswork among people who really have no idea whether or not what they're saying is true, eh?

Further, i would add that the "card" accounts are generally mimicking a known sockpuppeteer called "nuclearumpf". I have no idea if it actually is him or not, but would not be surprised to discover that it's in fact someone seeking to expose his activities rather than to aid them. At any rate, whoever might be responsible, it isn't me. This poster is generally believed to have returned to wikipedia under another user name that uses conspicuously similar arguments, syntax, and makes obviously similar spelling and grammatical errors. Looking at these other accounts, though, i think it's obvious that none of them have even a passing resemblance to me, my writing style, or are linked up to my ip. And yet we now have an admin popping in here and suggesting that certain accounts are "confirmed" to be associated with me? Stone put to sky (talk) 06:20, 10 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The "card" accounts are definitely unrelated to you. However, you appear to be IP hopping within a narrow range but from the same computer, and not only the accounts listed above but also  and  are likely to be you. Thatcher 17:07, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''