Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Supreme Cmdr

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Supreme Cmdr (3rd)





 * Code letter: B (see the ArbCom ruling, specifically this section)

User Supreme Cmdr was banned from Wikipedia for one year, and banned indfinitely from editing Derek Smart. BlindMoose, a single-purpose account, has reverted the article against the ArbCom ruling. The user has since been blocked.

It is assumed that 209.214.20.239 is the same user, having made the same reversion as BlindMoose, as well as having the same ISP/IP block as 209.214.21.8. 209.214.21.8 is apparently the same user as BlindMoose, judging from this edit and subsequent signings by BlindMoose.

The nature of the reverts and writing style/wording of BlindMoose are practically identical to that of Supreme Cmdr. Realizing that BlindMoose has been indefinitely blocked, it would still be helpful to document a pattern of behavior (e.g. evading blocks and flouting an ArbCom ruling) for the suspected puppetmaster.

(Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 18:15, 12 March 2007 (UTC)


 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 21:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Supreme Cmdr 2





 * Code letter: E

I suspect Supreme Cmdr of using socks to avoid a 3RR violation on Derek Smart. Diffs: , , , . Also Supreme Cmdr's revert at. Shadow1 (talk) 15:25, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

The two logged-in users are ❌. I to check the IP. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 19:52, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Supreme Cmdr




Supreme_Cmdr has a long history of being the only person challenging the content in question, suddenly out of nowhere comes another user challenging sources and content. Just want to make sure we're not being hoodwinked - Supreme_Cmdr is also currently blocked for blanking Lordkazan 20:34, 29 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I first watched the article on the 8th of August persuant to a user-conduct RFC. Perhaps it's time for another user-conduct RFC. JBKramer 20:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah i'm really being "a naughty user" by not agreeing with you and wanting to make sure you are not Supreme_Cmdr. Yup.. totally a naughty user.. doesn't wikipedia have a policy against making threats? something like WP:CIVIL.  Though i believe it doesn't have a policy against dripping sarcasm fortunately :D Lordkazan 20:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * You are saying you are engaging in a fishing expidition? JBKramer 20:51, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Do i look like law enforcement? I'm being thorough. Lordkazan 20:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)


 * ❌. Jayjg (talk) 20:52, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you for checking Lordkazan 20:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''