Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Taeguk Warrior

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Taeguk Warrior




Quoting from LactoseTI:


 * User continuously skirts blocks with large block of IP's.


 * Here, he seems to imply that a comment was left by him here.
 * That IP (71.124.113.216) is from a hostname ending with ".chi01.dsl-w.verizon.net." Here again he mentions he forgot to sign in and had the IP 71.124.122.59, another from the same block.


 * He has been blocked repeatedly for blanking his talk page, removing PUI tags/vandalism from pictures he uploaded, etc. (now on his second 1 week block). The longest blocks were the last two consecutive week long ones which he seems to have avoided by editing from his IP directly:


 * 02:43, August 18, 2006 1 week
 * 01:10, August 11, 2006 1 week


 * He seems to have skirted his first one week block using the ip 71.124.34.4 (from the "chi01.dsl-w.verizon.net" pool, contributions here, where he amassed first a 24 hour and then a 48 block. Started editing on August 12, 2006 from this IP, one day into his first 1 week block, diving right into the same Masutatsu Oyama article, removing PUI tags /from the images uploaded by Taeguk Warrior here,  , , , , , etc. (there are many).


 * Here he copied an unusually worded warning onto my talk page from Taeguk Warrior's user page here.


 * When this IP was blocked for 48 hours, only a short time after coming off a 24 hour block, a couple of edits from 74.64.70.159 contributions here (outside of the pool) continued his reverts on Masutatsu Oyama.


 * After a day or so, edits started coming in from 71.124.36.224 contributions here, again in the "chi01.dsl-w.verizon.net" pool to the same Masutatsu Oyama article. They continued edits on a few articles frequented by Taeguk Warrior, including one created by him here .  Here, his edit summary refers to me specifically (saying that since he added a free picture it must make me angry (I had cleaned up the article significantly and tagged some unfree images he uploaded).


 * At this point his week long block expired and he promptly found himself under another 1 week block for doing the same thing (removing tags, blanking his user page--unknowingly I may have fanned the flames a bit, my vandal script noticed him making the same changes I had tagged as vandalism. He reverted my warnings as well as those from administrators/others.


 * Now that he's on his second week-long block, he has started editing from 72.69.105.138 contributions here, again in the chi01.dsl-w.verizon.net pool. Again, he is reverting/removing bits of content from Masutatsu Oyama, though it's relatively minor compared to what he was doing before.


 * At first I didn't notice they were all from the same pool, but not only do they have blatantly the same edit patterns. I put it together when I realized the only time these IP's show up is when the main account is blocked, and happened to see his post on the Masuyama talk page where he seemed to indicate that he was in the same pool.  There are other edits in other articles, but the Masuyama article illustrates it particularly well since there are very few editors involved with it (and I wanted to keep this as brief as possible).


 * I thought he'd cool down a bit and make some valuable contributions (he has the capability--he added to several articles with some nice pictures). It seems, though, that he might not be cooling down at all--perhaps because he just avoids the block and keeps editing.  It's unfortunate because he's a relatively new user and just seems to be escalating the bad edits vs. the good ones.  I had originally thought to request semi-protection for the Masuyama page, though it seems kind of unnecessary since he does seem to blank/revert less when he's blocked.  Of course, I'm discouraged when my edits are undone and he's uncivil--namecalling and the like, but I'll stick around.  I'd just avoid the articles he's editing, but he seems now to want to "follow me around," putting my contribution link on his user page (originally under a list of stalkers, now by itself).  Sometimes he's particularly viscious, tagging good faith efforts as "vandalism" to confuse the issue.  If anyone has some suggestions, I'm all ears.  — LactoseTI T 06:23, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

He has shown blatant disregard for pretty much any policy on the site (see his talk page), so this is just the latest violation ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  19:31, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

The formatting of the request was a little odd. I fixed up a little, and it should be easier to read. The refactoring/reformatting I did is [ here]. --Kevin_b_er 19:51, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

If these IPs are acting like him they may be blocked as such. Mackensen (talk) 12:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''