Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tancred

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

User:Tancred

 * Code Letter: C
 * Code Letter: C
 * Code Letter: C
 * Code Letter: C
 * Code Letter: C
 * Code Letter: C

A long pattern of attacking rugby league manual of style abuse ,, and pushing out of context soccer references as football, ,. A long habit of edit-warring, , , , , , , , , with the aid of possible sockpuppet, User:Dibo. Another possible sockpuppet is ip number, User:203.219.152.174, which is being used to avoid scrutiny for the edits. These edits have been pulled up by a variety of different users that have seemingly no connection to one another, from i.p. numbers from different sides of the world, some of them, that are variously accused and banned wrongly of being sockpuppets (without any evidence, by administrators that see only the continued page and not by checkusers),, by an unconventional page which shows that there is no link between any of the groups, but than uses that as evidence, ,. You will notice they all claim the one source (With seemingly no evidence)although the articles of dispute are usually quite varied and based around one fact, that despite Manual of style, rugby league football is not apparently football.

This user has a proven animosity to rugby league football,, , and has been extremely abusive in the past, just like the suspected sockpuppet. The suspected sockpuppets tend to congregate on the same pages with the exact same issue. These examples can be seen above in the history of edit-warring links that user:Dibo is reguarly pulling the exact same agenda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Senibleconext (talk • contribs)

Tancred recently filed an RFCU listing the requester, User:Senibleconext, as a sock. ST47 14:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

❌.  Voice -of- All  18:57, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''