Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tarakonas

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Tarakonas



 * Code letter: G
 * Supporting evidence: I have placed evidence, which make me think that these 3 editors may be one and the same person. Evidences show similarities in editing pattern, accounts registration, affected articles etc. Socks are used to give the impression of more support for a particular viewpoint. For instance editors with long editing history felt that certain information (in this case ethnic group) should be kept in articles, however these listed editors made a impression that there is a different consensus . Similar support for a particular viewpoint occurred with image placement affecting multiply articles   etc. Looking further similar "support" took place on another picture's talk page, then accounts reinforced their POV . Apart of these editors, similar concept draw no support from other contributors. Then encountered different view, editors in question, demonstrated similar abusive language (accusations of falsification of history etc.) on various occasions  etc. Finally, fuelling various revert warring is also common pattern to them   (more on those on WP:SSP page; finally IP was blocked for 3RR). Sorry for expanded explanation, but I see only this as the only way to demonstrate these inappropriate sockpuppets behaviour. M.K. (talk) 11:02, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Code letter: G
 * Supporting evidence: I have placed evidence, which make me think that these 3 editors may be one and the same person. Evidences show similarities in editing pattern, accounts registration, affected articles etc. Socks are used to give the impression of more support for a particular viewpoint. For instance editors with long editing history felt that certain information (in this case ethnic group) should be kept in articles, however these listed editors made a impression that there is a different consensus . Similar support for a particular viewpoint occurred with image placement affecting multiply articles   etc. Looking further similar "support" took place on another picture's talk page, then accounts reinforced their POV . Apart of these editors, similar concept draw no support from other contributors. Then encountered different view, editors in question, demonstrated similar abusive language (accusations of falsification of history etc.) on various occasions  etc. Finally, fuelling various revert warring is also common pattern to them   (more on those on WP:SSP page; finally IP was blocked for 3RR). Sorry for expanded explanation, but I see only this as the only way to demonstrate these inappropriate sockpuppets behaviour. M.K. (talk) 11:02, 12 January 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ - also -  A l is o n  ❤ 11:09, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * confirmed accounts blocked and tagged as sockpuppets, by DarkFalls. Spebi 21:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''