Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ted Wilkes

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Ted Wilkes again

 * (blocked for a year after arbcom ruling)
 * (sockpuppet, blocked indefinitely)



The purpose of this request is to know if Lochdale is the same as Ted Wilkes aka Duisburg Dude. Ted Wilkes was himself a sockpuppet of User:DW aka User:NightCrawler aka User:Black Widow, etc. For detailed evidence of similar edit patterns, refer to this post by User:Onefortyone on my talk page. Previous checkuser request about Ted Wilkes is here. Mushroom (Talk) 16:02, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

❌ Mackensen (talk) 17:01, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.'' ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

and related accounts
See this discussion at AN/I: I think there is enough evidence to request a CheckUser. Unfortunately it's too late to check for User:DW, User:JillandJack, User:Angelique and so on, but it would be interesting to know if there is a connection between these users: I would also like to know if this user is somehow related, since he has been accused of being a sockpuppet of DW: Mushroom (Talk) 21:28, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * (on probation)
 * 66.186.250.106
 * 66.61.69.65
 * Any IP in the range 64.228.30.0/24 (used by DW in 2003)
 * 66.186.250.106
 * 66.61.69.65
 * Any IP in the range 64.228.30.0/24 (used by DW in 2003)


 * Based on checkuser evidence, which I also ran past David Gerard and have emailed privately to the rest of the Arbitration Committee, I have concluded that Mayamushu and Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) are not the same as the others or as each other. Ted Wilkes, Danny B. (usurped) and Karl Schalike appear likely to be the same. I can't go into detail for obvious reasons, but the AC has my reasoning and other checkers are welcome to look if they find it unconvincing.  Sam Korn (smoddy) 18:01, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made below, in a new section.''