Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Termer

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Termer



 * G:


 * Supporting evidence: Since it's been suggested that Martintg is an alternate account of Termer I'd like to get this cleared. Thanks!--Termer (talk) 06:30, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Support this request for checkuser. Badagnani (talk) 06:36, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment: Checkuser clearly states it should not be requested as a Checkuser on yourself to "prove your innocence". Dayewalker (talk) 06:49, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - I will initiate it, then. No problem. Badagnani (talk) 06:50, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

- since this is filed under code "G", can we at least have some summary, with evidence, of some justification for running this checkuser. Before it's dismissed by myself or another checkuser, can we at least see something here to warrant compromising both parties' privacy? - A l is o n  ❤ 09:01, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment please follow the link at the evidence section above, it directs to . And sorry for missing the policy note that you're not allowed to clear your user-name from false accusations. Thank you Badagnani for your help!--Termer (talk) 15:50, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


 * PS. Since it's been suggested that the case might compromise both parties' privacy, I've notified also Martintg about the issue and in case he feels so, I'm going to withdraw this case. For my part, I don't think check-user would compromise my privacy in any way.--Termer (talk) 18:55, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok, please note that checkuser cannot "prove innocence". However, I can say that both of these editors are highly to be connected to the one editor -  A l is o n  ❤ 19:25, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''