Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/The dert

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

The dert





 * Code letter: C

( is listed as the main account since that is the vandalizing account, although Smick750 has a much more extensive edit history.)  has been engaging in inappropriate editing (see, e.g.,, ,  -- the one that caught my attention and caused me to warn him/her.  Since then, he/she has engaged in harassing my on my talk page (latest instance:  -- which is followed by 's most recent gem:. It should be noted that Smick750 has, at the same time, given The dert a frivolous award ( -- a copy and paste with modification of one of the awards that I received. Meanwhile,  has purportedly "verified" the questionable information that The dert posted .  Meanwhile, all three of these accounts edit the same articles.  (After I filled out the request,  made a comment in Smick750's name and immediately changed the signature to Smick750.)

With Smick750 having made a number of positive edits, I'm hesitant to simply block all of them as disruptive accounts without having first requested a CheckUser. If CheckUser verifies that they're all the same account, I'm inclined to block all three. Nlu (talk) 16:56, 3 January 2007 (UTC)


 * ✅ that User:Smick750, User:Perjaboam and User:194.69.198.242 are the same person.
 * as to whether these three are linked to User:The dert. Rebecca 01:54, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

I am Perjaboam but not The Dert. I am unsure as to those numbers.

I have done very little as Perjaboam but what I have done has been referenced and not abusive at all. I just wanted to add a detail to a page of a friend and was keen not to have him see it was me. It was not an abusive post. Just about music. But my identity is identifiable to friends through the name Smick750. That is why I set up the sockpuppet but can see why it is wrong. In relation to the monkey item, it is true and therefore I can't see why Nlu is so agressively opposed to its inclusion.

I am a friend of the person who calls himself the dert and he has emailed me to tell me what he is doing which would explain why he has made posts at similar times. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smick750 (talk • contribs)
 * Care to justify this? The reason why I warned The dert is due to the entire edit history, which gives me absolutely no confidence in the factual accuracy of any of his posts.  And you are hardly in a position to "verify" his/her edits after what you did.  --Nlu (talk) 16:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''