Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Todd Bridges

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Todd_Bridges




User_talk:Georgewiliamherbert has been reverting my user talk page repeatedly for the past few days, after another user, User_talk:Todd_Bridges, put up a vandalism warning. Todd Bridges put up a vandalism warning as retribution for my own tagging of his page with a vandalism warning, because he, and another user, kept erasing conversation from Talk:Gorilla. I felt the conversation should be kept, but Todd Bridges wanted his way. I cleared my talk page of the vandalism, gave him a warning, and now this other, otherwise uninvolved person keeps reverting to Todd Bridges' warning, which was vandalism to begin with, and tagging me with MORE vandalism warnings. despite warnings on his page, he continues to provoke a fight, which can only be rooted in being a sock puppet for todd bridges.ThuranX 14:31, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Note also that User_talk:Georgewiliamherbert was blocked indefinitely by User:Shimgray for being an impostor of my account. Georgewilliamherbert 02:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

✅. Same individual is also User:Mr. Conky. Essjay (  Talk  •  Connect  )  09:57, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

When I was looking into this, I thought both accounts might be socks of, who was blocked for incivility, with the block extended to indef for socking through a bunch of IPs including. (See this edit for an example of why Whoohookitty blocked him.) Essjay checked and found that a connection was Likely. Thatcher131 14:03, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''