Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tom.mevlie

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Willreland



 * Code letter: G


 * Supporting evidence:WillIreland recently posted on WP:ANI that he was a sock puppet of Tom.mevlie and that he wanted (demanded) to be blocked multiple times. Im his adopter and i consider this extremly out of charactor. I have reason to beleave there is a possibiliy his account has been comprimised. Can you check that he is a sock puppet, Also i need to know when was the earliest date that those two account appear to be linked. This user made constuctive edits untill to days ago... thanks  « l | Ψrom3th3ăn ™ | l »   (talk) 14:19, 14 June 2008 (UTC)


 * merge with Requests for checkuser/Case/Tom.mevlie. Thatcher 15:33, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * So they are the same user?  « l | Ψrom3th3ăn ™ | l »   (talk) 00:45, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes. Thatcher 05:49, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes. Thatcher 05:49, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Tom.mevlie





 * Code letter: C
 * Supporting evidence: DangerTM admitted that he was Tom.mevlie and both accounts have been blocked for sock-puppetry, uncivil behavior and disruption. When DangerTM was blocked for disrupting the election of WP:NOVELS he came back as WilliamMThompson, but since he seemed to behave he wasn't blocked at once. He was later blocked by me for 48 hours for using his old accounts to commit vandalism that he would then revert with his WilliamMThompson account (as well as "attacking" his new main account), obviously to make himself look better. Now the election process is once again being disrupted by SPAs, probably controlled by WilliamMThompson (just like Tom.mevlie they like to write "cunt" in capital letters , ), and he's also likely to have been behind recent "vandalism" on his own user page , trying to improve his image once again. Before I issue a longer block I'd like firm proof. Longer posts about the identification of WilliamMThompson and Tom.mevlie: , . Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 17:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Editor has documented the probability that  is another sockpuppet: see diff. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 19:14, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * WilliamMThompson has been indef blocked by another admin for violating WP:VIOLENCE, but I'd still like a checkuser to confirm the sockpuppets for future reference. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 14:00, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

✅ for

that this person is the same as

Note that these last 4 accounts were created at the same time, indicating a persistent desire to use sockpuppets, and the some of the accounts on the list above were used to vote stack in another Wikiproject discussion. Also, this user has made some pretty nasty comments while logged out. Thatcher 14:20, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I have tagged and/or blocked all the accounts accordingly. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 14:55, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''