Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tommiks

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

, ,
After investigating the cases, and merging users contributions, I came to the conclusion that Cool_Cat was right and he was not Karabekir. On the other hand, I now know that Tommiks used two sock to get involved in some issues without having his reputation harmed. Here are the result of my merging test: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fadix/evidencepage I have bolded the entire texts when two segment showed a continuity. The thing is that I am sure he has used proxies, otherwise why will he deny it, but I am taking the chance here in cases he hasn't or made few mistakes. The merging test clearly shows that they are the same user, everytime one disappeared the other reappeared continuing the ohers work where he has left, an example is when on March 3, 2006 22:48, Karabekir made an edit deleting temporarly the Turkish position section, it was in fact to reorganize it, we understand this after it has been reintroduced after working on it, 20 minutes after, they were reintroduced by pieces, NOT by Karabekir but Tommiks , ,. The merging test is full of such examples. As can be shown in my evidence page merging test, they are all the same users, they also have identical edit summaries and wordings in many cases and have done the same particular grammar mistakes, an example is 'paragraf' insteed of 'paragraph.', ,. (see summary)

While checkuser is not in my opinion necessary to establish the identity of the socks, that Tommiks is denying his involvement made me think that it would be a plus if by mistake he has done few mistakes.

The reason why I think it is important, is to clean my reputation from a user that has used socks to support eachothers edits and scrapped the Armenian genocide article and then when criticised used another sock to support the other user, in the last weeks many new users appeared like this leterally invading articles and I have attempted to find socks and here is my first one, since I have others which I need to find in due time. I believe my request should be accepted since it is fully justified in my opinion. Fad (ix) 17:34, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Update: I thought that I should clarify more why it is necessary to checkuse. The Armenian Genocide article is considered controversial and it was agreed that a discussion should be made in the discussion page before making any significant edit, the discussion page also contains that warning. I warned Karabekir to stick to that and discuss before, but he has completly rearranged and made various major changes. When another member reverted, OttomanReference came in to Karabekirs rescue supporting his edits and rereverting to Karabekirs version. Also, when I have warned Karabekir in his talk page that he has made enought major edits and that we should first discuss the changes he slandered me. If there is need to more justification for a checkuser and that is the reason of this delay, I will gladly provide them. Fad (ix) 18:52, 29 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Declined. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 18:52, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''