Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tpharish

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Tpharish



 * Code letter: A, C


 * Supporting evidence: To whom it may concern. There has recently been numerous vandalism attacks and revert wars on the Periyar page. These attacks and reverts tend to come from editors with usernames in red with the most recent from Tpharish by blanking a section and engaging in edit warring here, here, and here. User Tpharish also posted a vulgar word in Tamil, koodhi meaning vagina here and blatantly changed the percentage of Brahmins here. As for Naidruva, he has added an irrelevant sentence to a referenced section, which is not quoted from the source of origin here. Dindiz is another account which was used to add an unsourced reference to Periyar in a derogatory fashion here with another addition on religion here. With Akt007, this account has been used to remove a Kannada script from the page here as well as by 59.92.140.66 here. Multiple reverts to add back the Kannda script can be found by 59.92.173.128 here, 59.92.148.26 here, 59.92.133.68 here, 59.96.45.168 here, and by 117.192.99.81 here. As for IP user 122.164.199.184, this account has been used to vandalize a page by changing the name Shudra to Kshatriya here, and by 112.164.86.116 here. Lastly, IP user 122.164.29.66 has blatantly put a factual acuracy template under a particular section which was referenced with valid sources here. It is evident that there is a user or users who is bent on vandalizing this page by changing caste names, engaging in edit wars by adding and removing certain scripts, blanking sections, and adding a vulgarity to this page on Periyar. I therefore respectfully request to have these accounts checked to see if they are sock puppet accounts and for the necessary action to be taken. Thank you. Wiki Raja (talk) 10:16, 13 October 2008 (UTC)


 * This is better taken to WP:SSP where if it walks and quacks like a sock, it may be blocked like a sock without a CU. There does not seem to be any block/ban evasion here that would justify the CU request, and the contributions do not indicate serious pattern vandalism. -- Avi (talk) 13:51, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * For reference purposes, this SSP enty is created after this RfCU is declined. OhanaUnitedTalk page 13:00, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment As per Avi's suggestion, this sock inquiry has been moved to SSP. Thanks. Wiki Raja (talk) 07:20, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''