Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Veecort

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Veecort

 * – pool-151-201-117-169.pitt.east.verizon.net
 * – ip70-190-149-252.ph.ph.cox.net
 * Code letter: F
 * Code letter: F
 * Code letter: F


 * Supporting evidence: I blocked Veecort about a day ago for edit warring in response to an AN3 report and an IP shows up a few hours later and reverts to Veecort's exact same last version before being blocked while dropping a note on my talk page expressing the same points as Veecort. Both IPs visible are from Pennsylvania (one Philadelphia and the other Pittsburgh), but since verizon, cox, swbell, and others tend to use the city where their main datacenter is, I figure it could be a home v. work kind of thing.  Anyway, figure I'd drop it here to get it off my plate. :P  Cheers. =) -- slakr  \ talk / 08:23, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh wait, I think I might be a retard. The ph could be Phoenix, AZ.  Feel free to trout me.  -- slakr  \ talk / 08:29, 24 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I independently wrote up an SSP on Veecort. Posting it here per slakr's request. McJeff (talk) 09:35, 24 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Update: It looks like the user is admitting to meatpuppetry ( and ), so it's likely the checkuser isn't really needed any more, though might still be a good idea to make sure it's actually meatpuppetry as opposed to sockpuppetry. *shrug* Annnyway.... :P -- slakr \ talk / 02:22, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * My person opinion is that the Checkuser should be done. A third IP address 164.156.231.55 performed the same revert that Veecort and co did .  164.56 is a Pennsylvania IP, as are the others.  McJeff (talk) 04:33, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * ph stands for phoenix, not PA. Next time do your research before you accuse. 70.190.149.252 (talk) 02:37, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

A simple geolocate, which anyone can do, shows these are from Pittsburgh PA, Harrisburg PA, and Phoenix, respectively.  — Rlevse • Talk  • 02:54, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''