Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Viran

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Viran
The user's first edit was to set up his userpage the same way that every other sock has.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 05:39, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I've moved this myself from the request for IP check section because he just keeps making more sockpuppets.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 02:44, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Just a note: This user seems to have moved on to making death threats SQL(Query Me!) 02:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Please list the code letter. Icestorm815 02:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Nothing that can be done. --Deskana (talk) 18:07, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Viran





 * Code letter: F

Current ANI Discussion, Previous ANI Discussion

Viran is an indef blocked user (for disruption, and, the threat of more disruption), and, apparently has no problem using socks. I beleive there are a lot more out there, as he's been willing to identify each one so far (usually slaps 'this is viran' in the edit summaries). He is using them to harass users, and, to disrupt in general.

Anyhow, I'd like to see, if it's possible, what other accounts there are, and, I'd like to make sure the underlying IP is blocked. SQL(Query Me!) 18:28, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

I've added four more users, and blocked which appears to be the IP he is using, which resolves to Opera's corporate offices. A checkuser may show the actual IP.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 05:09, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Results
++Lar: t/c 17:18, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Neo is not found. Is that possibly a typo?
 * Confirmed that Viran == Flight Of The neo  == Sairilian  == Sairiliyan  == Abhishka  == Theory_Of_Relativity  == Speed_of_Gravity == Neoshka == Neo.  == Virash
 * unconfirmed as related "N e o" (call that a )
 * additional very probable sleepers (blocked by me but need tagging)
 * note that was not listed above as one but matches (already blocked)
 * The block of 195.189.142.166 seems sound.
 * Not sure there are more IPs to block that are as sound as the first one...
 * Please keep an eye on ... their single edit is dubious as it is in this light/relativity area
 * There are a large number of other potential sleepers which I have chosen not to block (after consulting with fellow CUs) as I think they may possibly be innocent bystanders. All I can suggest is block based on contributions.
 * note that was not listed above as one but matches (already blocked)
 * The block of 195.189.142.166 seems sound.
 * Not sure there are more IPs to block that are as sound as the first one...
 * Please keep an eye on ... their single edit is dubious as it is in this light/relativity area
 * There are a large number of other potential sleepers which I have chosen not to block (after consulting with fellow CUs) as I think they may possibly be innocent bystanders. All I can suggest is block based on contributions.
 * I've tagged the ones you found, and, I'll keep an eye out, thank you Lar! SQL(Query Me!) 17:25, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''