Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Vr

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Vr

 * Code letter: G
 * Supporting evidence: ;
 * Code letter: G
 * Supporting evidence: ;
 * Code letter: G
 * Supporting evidence: ;
 * Code letter: G
 * Supporting evidence: ;

Previous confirmed socks below. Current suspects are listed in detail here. User:Rlevse suggested this RFCU to dig deeper and see if there are more socks. Both Delhite and Vr have a history of making attack edits to John Funder and promoting Ashoka Jahnavi-Prasad with ridiculously exaggerated claims. The various socks are mainly used during deletion debates and reviews. Delhite has stated a willingness to undergo a check user, but also claims to be using an institutional computer that is shared. Colin°Talk 19:46, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


 * - Accepting this case on the evidence of clear abusive socking on AfD, as well as the well-documented SSP case - A l is o n  ❤ 19:57, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Alison, Vr edited in Jan/Feb 2008, so how can it be stale? — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 20:02, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Duh! My bad, sorry :) - A l is o n  ❤ 20:30, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ - the following, as well as numerous loggings-out to edit:




 * - A l is o n  ❤ 20:30, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

all blocked indef and tagged. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 21:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Vr
See Articles for deletion/List of Indians where they vote for Keep within four minutes of each other and use the exact same mistakes (no space between vote and comment, parentheses around the ~ ). Danny Lilithborne 09:30, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
 * There is also . I've blocked all three accounts as socks of Vr, as I think the evidence is strong enough without a checkuser. Feel free to run the checkuser anyway to check, or remove this request as appropriate. Petros471 12:08, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Confirmed. Am blocking the IP for a month. Keep us informed of other possibilities. Essjay (  Talk  •  Connect  )  09:14, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''